Society Earth and Beyond Its Rebirth

(November 12th, 2017)

WITH a superficial knife wound to his waist the young man ran along the Manhattan sidewalk, calling out for assistance while panting heavily as he passed one closed shop after another. It was just minutes past midnight, and onlookers walking both sides of the street did nothing at all to help; instead, they gawked at his serious predicament, desperately seeking sanctuary via an open and lively business.

He turned his upper body to his right as he continued his flight (though gradually slowing to a jog) to see how far behind him his pursuer was, all the while aware of the cut to his side but unaware of its severity. He did know, however, that the shadowy figure maintaining a distance of no more than 40 metres behind him was the same scumbag who cut him. And such inhumanity for naught but his small amount of money and cheap wristwatch (twenty bucks), a grand total of forty-five bucks.

The young man would’ve willingly handed over everything, but the thug wasn’t used to such willingness, at least not without adding one or two more slashes with his seven-inch switchblade.

“You can have everything I got!” the young man tried shouting as he panted, becoming even shorter of breath than before. “What the hell do you want, for Christ sakes?!”

He then spotted sanctuary. A bright neon-light sign, which blared “OPEN,” just above the door of one of a half-dozen or so nightclubs in that small region of Manhattan. “Oh … thank God!” he gasped, then worked on catching his breath after arriving at the Plexiglas protected entrance-fee-collection booth.

The nightclub’s Plexiglas fortified entrance door was entirely covered from the inside by an opaque, red, felt curtain, with everything else external being the red brick sidewall right next to where he stood. He could hear the soothing sanctuary-safe sound of boisterous, open-for-business activity from within getting out through the one entrance.

He grabbed onto the door handle and pulled with all of his strength and weight behind his effort. Only his blunt grunt was the result, as the door refused to budge an iota.

This isn’t happening! he mentally shrieked.

Out came another such grunt when he again futilely yanked at the solidly locked door.

But the light’s on! his panicked thoughts continued reverberating, as he yanked even harder at the door, twice more. Why the fuck is it shut?!

“Uh … Thirty bucks, mister.”

“What … ? Where the …?” he muttered, looking around desperately for the disembodied request for the nightclub entrance fee.

“I said, thirty bucks cover-charge … if you want to get in.”

He looked at the booth beside him and the twenty-ish booth attendant within, staring back out at him apathetically.

“What? Thirty dollars?” he said, letting out a breath and behaving as though he never experienced a nightclub’s pay-booth before.

He anxiously fumbled about while pulling out a twenty from his right pocket and a five from his left; then he reached into his back pockets but found only lint.

“All I have is twenty-five — really,” he began to beg, turning his head to see how close behind the scumbag was.

There, no more than fifteen meters away, he could see the menacing thug, though only a shadow figure within the entranceway of a closed-for-the-night classy-appearance hat store.

“Hey, mister, do you have thirty bucks or not? … Look, I have to go use the john.”

The booth attendant stood up and walked through a rear door within the booth, and completely out of view. The booth light then went dim, although the nightclub’s innards remained quite active, and the neon light was still on, bright. However, he was still locked out tightly, to failingly fend for himself, his very life, simply because he was five dollars short.

His sole surviving family member, a young-adult little sister sunk deep in heartache and frustration, had those exact words engraved on her big brother’s gravestone: “His brief life cut short simply because he was five dollars short. Brandon Gridner, February 29, 2002 – November 12, 2017.”

‘How Many More Must Greatly Suffer or Die for Others’ Gratuitous Monetary Gain & Simultaneous Societal Mayhem?’

(June 7th, 2042)

With significant social-activism momentum building on local, regional, national and international scales for just a few months short of a full quarter century — ever since the tragically gratuitous, brutal killing of Brandon Gridner, for almost no monetary gain. It was an atypical cause for such a mass movement that was triggered within the New York City region; nevertheless, his story, his totally meaningless murder due to being but five dollars short of accessing asylum from a killer, soundly resonated with the people of America, followed closely by Canada, and beyond, from that day onwards.

There followed a great weight massive move forwards with such a historically unprecedented, revolutionary concept to gradually (over a ten year period) eliminate the entire globe’s monetary and precious-metals exchange systems, along with all stock/bond trading methodologies — i.e. making money off of others’ gains and losses.

The progressive movement indeed was almost entirely potently propelled by an enormous and inexcusably immoral gap between the superfluously wealthy top one percent of the planetary population and the struggling or outright impoverished bottom ninety-nine percent, the latter which lacked sufficient means by which to maintain an average quality of life and/or lifestyle (an ‘average’ based on a new, relative Earthly scale).

Of greatest concern, however, was the most critical juncture in Earth’s existence involving the inhabitability of the planet in regards to its air, land and water. Either the planet’s populace made a figurative ninety-degree turn towards one likely outcome or perpendicularly towards the other likely outcome.

One choice of course change would eventually result in a world of genuinely pristine eco-systems, thus safely breathable air and truly clean drinking water, etcetera. Accompanying this true progress in cleaning up Earth’s life-sustaining environment, was a complete cessation of all hunger, incessant though needless serious illness and great suffering, etcetera.

A course change towards the other direction, however, would be regressive, imminently leading humanity (not to mention its fellow Earthly creatures) back towards nightmarish, global scale, coal-dust-dark-gray, industrial-revolution-like existence. Eventually, it would result in a catastrophic planetary environmental consequence — one that would pollute Earth to a hopelessly prolific, profound degree.

Maintaining the same course straight ahead was also a path with a very bleak outcome for Earth’s various life forms, just of a different lot of negative occurrences taking a little longer to reach fruition (of course, periods of time relative to Earth’s great age).

Contrary to Big Capitalism and Industrialists’ cynical critiques against any slowing, let alone the ceasing of their unrelenting mass extraction of Earthly minerals and other natural resources, the diverse peoples, ideologies and cultures all over the planet wisely chose the correct, truly progressive course change that spared ‘spaceship’ Earth and its life so much agony and loss.

In less than five and a half decades, every nation of the world quite successfully initiated, managed and maintained an environment purification project involving every aspect of Earth’s air, land and waters. In fact, efforts proceeded so successfully that many cases of severe ecological toxification were actually halted then reversed back to a global environmental status of pristine eco-system sustainability, something not witnessed for three to four centuries in some major European nations.

“It all turned into like some version of Earth society from those very old Star Trek movies and television series I used to watch as a young boy,” a 103-year-old Canadian man of amazingly sound memory was quoted by TIME magazine’s April 10, 2138 issue.

‘We Made the Right Choice for Progressive Change & We Live Quite Well By It!’

(June 7th, 2142)

To the day, exactly one hundred years had passed since that one spring morning, Earth’s populace began accumulating in every capital and major city across the planet just a few hours after a New York City gathering became the launching point for the most profound cause to date in human history. Planet-wide, the peaceful yet cohesive demonstrators all made the utmost insightful choice of their lives and their future as a ‘collective humanity.’ The people, about 10.23 billion in number, redirected their destiny towards an absolute elimination of all pollutants, mostly in the form of insidious bio-toxic substances, followed by a 180-degree reversal of the global pollution crises that had reigned for much too long and for too much of the wrong reasons.

All the while, truly effective population control also became and remained a reality, soon eliminating such past ordeals as the mass famines of Africa, particularly during the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. On the other front, to stop mass famine suffering, the elimination of all forms of planetary pollutants such as ozone-depleting greenhouse gases over decades of environmental progress virtually totally resolved previously precarious irregular global weather systems that caused massive-scale crop-destroying devastating floods, permafrost and drought. But human ingenuity received the most credit for the exponential increase in agricultural efficiency bio-technology and eco-friendly fertilization of crops.

Perhaps most profound, wars, be they ‘civil’ or transnational, and genocide naturally became without-exception unacceptable concepts, let alone options for any reason at all. Simultaneously, respect for life extended to all animals, translating into vegetarianism becoming the culinary-art-form-to-perfect for the twenty-second century and well beyond.

Also, the refreshing fact that no nation any longer utilized the innately abused monetary system imminently ensured that stockpiles of gold bullion would no longer almost entirely represent gratuitous wealth and monetary value but rather would be melted down for progressive use as constructive elements for clean, green technologies, etcetera.

In this new era, every person on the planet could be employed according to his or her talents, mostly acquired through universally accessible higher learning institutions, therefore contributing towards positive societal or global functions to varying degrees of skills progression, in the manner which he or she genuinely desires. Hence, all citizens could acquire the skills and professions of their own choice, to their own fulfillment, while experiencing a real sense of accomplishment and thus satisfaction—without having to suffer any anxieties whatsoever over potential or actual financial obstacles (i.e. late home mortgage payments followed by bank foreclosure).

Every person began thinking for him- or herself: How exactly does a person truly, justly “earn” $100 billion — in both a moral sense as well as that of a universally accessible contribution to society? One would conclude that to “earn” so many billions of dollars, the lucky person would be performing some super humanitarian feat for the planet’s populace or spaceship Earth itself through that person’s pristine upkeep of the planet’s eco-systems. Or the multi-billionaire would have eliminated starvation or alleviated at least a large chunk of the mass suffering occurring 24/7 around so much of the world — for example, through his mass distribution of much needed medicines.

It simply cannot be done — not from a moral perspective, it was agreed upon by all.

Salaries and wages were no longer allocated within the same marginalizing framework that in the past resulted in large, unjust gaps between the personal wealth and therefore quality of life of one extremely small portion of the populace compared to that of the vast majority of Earth citizens. Instead, all were accorded secured computerized “credits” with the ‘payout’ based on the time and effort that ‘employees’ put into their profession, the quality and quantity of their education/training as well as the “human and environment responsibility” involved in their profession.

All said, there would not be lingering desires for superfluous mass credit accumulation — a concept of ‘savings’ that was decidedly left behind in the socially dysfunctional past — because no one would be left to want of any necessity of life or moderation of lifestyle comfort.

There was to no longer be any enduring temptation or compulsion to hoard anything, let alone monetary wealth.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

Is There Any Entertainment In Observing Infant and Toddler ‘Actors’ Being Potentially Traumatized?

In his book The Interpretation of Dreams, Dr. Sigmund Freud states: “It is painful to me to think that many of the hypotheses upon which I base my psychological solution of the psychoneuroses will arouse skepticism and ridicule when they first become known. For instance, I shall have to assert that impressions of the second year of life, and even the first, leave an enduring trace upon the emotional life of subsequent neuropaths [i.e. neurotic persons], and that these impressions—although greatly distorted and exaggerated by the memory—may furnish the earliest and profoundest basis of a hysterical [i.e. neurotic] symptom … [I]t is my well-founded conviction that both doctrines [i.e. theories] are true. In confirmation of this I recall certain examples in which the death of the father occurred when the child was very young, and subsequent incidents, otherwise inexplicable, proved that the child had unconsciously preserved recollections of the person who had so early gone out of its life.”

Contemporary research tells me that, since it cannot fight or flight, a baby stuck in a crib on its back hearing parental discord in the next room can only “move into a third neurological state, known as  a ‘freeze’ state … This freeze state is a trauma state” (Childhood Disrupted: How Your Biography Becomes Your Biology, and How You Can Heal, pg.123).

This causes its brain to improperly develop; and if allowed to continue, it’s the helpless infant’s starting point towards a childhood, adolescence and (in particular) adulthood in which its brain uncontrollably releases potentially damaging levels of inflammation-promoting stress hormones and chemicals, even in non-stressful daily routines.

I also now know that it’s the unpredictability of a stressor, and not the intensity, that does the most harm. When the stressor “is completely predictable, even if it is more traumatic—such as giving a [laboratory] rat a regularly scheduled foot shock accompanied by a sharp, loud sound—the stress does not create these exact same [negative] brain changes.” (pg. 42)

Decades before reading Freud’s theories or any others regarding very early life trauma, I’d always cringe at how producers and directors of negatively melodramatic scenes—let alone the willing parents of the undoubtedly extremely upset infants and toddlers used—could comfortably conclude that no psychological harm would result in the baby ‘actors’ screaming  in bewilderment.

Initially I’d presumed there was an educated general consensus within the entertainment industry on this matter, perhaps even on the advice of mental health academia, otherwise the practice would logically compassionately cease. But I became increasingly doubtful of the accuracy of any such educated consensus. (And why even designate them as ‘actors’, when true actors are fully cognizant of their fictional environment?)

Cannot one logically conclude by observing their turmoil-filled facial expressions that they’re perceiving, and likely cerebrally recording, the hyper-emotional scene activity around them at face value rather than as a fictitious occurrence?

I could understand the practice commonly occurring within a naïve entertainment industry of the 20th Century, but I’m still seeing it in contemporary small and big screen movie productions.

One relatively recent example, in the movie Hustlers (with actress Jennifer Lopez), has a toddler who is clearly actually distraught, wailing while caught in between a screaming match between mother (“Destiny”) and father characters.

An older example is in the 2008 movie Pride and Glory, where actor Colin Farrell’s crooked-cop character holds a screaming baby while threatening to hot-iron its face if he doesn’t get the information he wants from the infant’s gangster father. There’s hyper-dramatic screaming by all the characters, of course, but not all are aware it’s just acting.

And let’s not overlook the melodramatic scene in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 in which a rocking Severus Snape wails over a dead Lily Potter in his arms, as the Harry-Potter-as-an-infant ‘actor’ also cries at what he perceives as genuine heartbreaking-loss mourning. …

Within the last two years, I’ve emailed, and left a voice message with, the Union of British Columbia Performers numerous times on this matter, all to which I  received no response.

Meanwhile, in January of 2017, a Vancouver dog-rescue organization cancelled a scheduled fundraiser preceding the big release of the then-new film A Dog’s Purpose, according to a Vancouver Sun story, after “the German shepherd star of the film was put under duress during one scene.”

The founder of Thank Dog I Am Out (Dog Rescue Society), Susan Paterson, was quoted as saying, “We are shocked and disappointed by what we have seen, and we cannot in good conscience continue with our pre-screening of the movie.”

(This incident created a controversy for the ensuing news week.)

While animal cruelty by the industry shouldn’t be tolerated, there should be even less allowance for using unaware infants and toddlers in negatively hyper-emotional drama—especially when contemporary alternatives can readily be utilized (e.g. a mannequin infant or digital manipulation tech).

P.S. The actors guild has yet to reply to my query (sent multiple times, over the last two years or so), a copy of which is included below. That indicates to me that either I have a point, or I’m way off and not worth their time.
Dear Sir/Ms.,
Are infants/toddlers who are not aware they’re in a fake environment still used in the production of negatively melodramatic or hyper-emotional small and big screen entertainment?
I’d think the practice would’ve been discontinued by now, due to current knowledge about the susceptibilities of the developing infant/toddler brain, but I’d like to know for sure.
Thank you for your time.
F. Sterle

Citizen Lorne & His Stare Dare Challenge Rule

SIMPLY unable to resist a ‘stare dare’ challenge, or on occasion initiating one himself, Lorne always kept an eye out, while walking around town, for the rare guy with that particular appearance which screamed out the Hollywood cliché, machismo motto, “make my day.” Furthermore, Lorne did so regardless of knowing that practicing such a habitual, dangerous, foolhardy game would eventually, perhaps even imminently, get him or the other guy severely injured or killed, all for his dose of adrenalin rush to which he was accustomed to receiving from such stare dares. But there was no sure way of knowing in advance if the potential stare dare challenge walking towards him would be his last—only after the dare had been initiated and carried out to its conclusion, whatever it may include.

Lorne felt that reacting to a stare dare involved common sense and was straightforward enough using man’s naturally built-in ‘tough guy’ instincts. To avoid inadvertently initiating a stare dare also involved common sense yet there still was the one rule typically easily understood.

Although it all could still result in one guy nursing a bruised ego and/or eye if (even well intentioned) conduct is misconstrued, quite simply if two guys approaching each other, say, on a city sidewalk, are destined to imminently pass right by one another (with a typical couple of feet in between them), the guy who supposedly just intended to glance towards the other guy however catches the guy already staring at him, the latter is to be allowed to stare back until the other guy looks away.

But Lorne often didn’t play by the rule, and he wouldn’t feel any more compelled to do so had it been written in a large, hardbound book available to read at any bookstore and public library. In fact, he would often initiate a stare dare, then he’d audaciously maintain his glare at the other guy (who, by the rule, had the ‘right of way’ to stare back and maintain such until the initiator himself looked away). As the guy would briefly glance at Lorne, who was still staring at him, and felt intimidated into avoiding a verbal, perhaps followed by a physical, confrontation, the guy would then look away as the two passed each other—all occurring just before Lorne, as a finale, turned his head and continued eyeing the guy, just for good measure.

All of Lorne’s friends and worried family members could clearly see that he was really pushing his luck by recklessly stare dare challenging big guys through his blatant breaking of the rule—very dangerous behavior, especially given his extreme nearsightedness, which is crippling without his expensive glasses. For, someday, the other guy may simultaneously brazenly break the rule, or simply respond in kind to Lorne’s open contempt for his targets’ own sense of self-esteem. As luck would have it, Lorne came upon just such a match while spending an afternoon downtown.

ONE can conceivably consider such a potentially precarious situation as ‘the perfect storm,’ this case being that in which two anomalous yet equally intense conditions (i.e. two guys who are very angry over unjust treatment) collide together at a crossing in a very bad point in space-time.

To avoid confusion, for many years Lorne was aware that his hazardous anti-social behavior was the result of the Rubic’s Cube sized chip on his shoulder, with itself being directly linked to his compulsion to over-compensate—i.e. aggressiveness, plus interest—for the large quantity of bullying that he barely endured in his youth. Even worse, if Lorne happened to also be in a bad mood on the same day that he initiated a stare dare challenge, he allowed his bad mood to considerably exacerbate the confrontational situation—all regardless of knowing that such a dish as the stare dare challenge was one best served cold.

On this one ‘bad day,’ Lorne strongly felt that he was unjustly verbally assaulted by an unruly, female fellow bus passenger; even worse, one against whom he knew that he could not physically retaliate, for it was against his congenital nature to ‘hit a girl.’ Indeed, Lorne, especially as a boy, was always the kind to take fisticuffs from the girls, doing naught but his best to manoeuver around or deflect their swings.

Thus, that afternoon, Lorne was left with only burning bitterness and frustration.

The other, significant condition was the approaching guy who was slightly larger than Lorne in all three dimensions, though his size didn’t act as a ‘fear factor’ problem for Lorne, who simply psychologically compensated for the guy’s extra size by setting his ‘efforts meter mark’ a bit higher. Inside the fast approaching guy’s mind was an infestation of fury over a cheating common-law wife, who also took him for virtually everything he had, including every penny that he put towards their joint bank account.

Hence, he was stuck in an enraged state of mind and more than willing to teach a good lesson to the next guy who just looked at him sideways—or atypically of the societal norm of a quick glance before returning to looking straight ahead.

With only a few meters away from passing right by each other, Lorne—once again willing to break the stare dare rule thus pushing the envelope of his luck—initiated a stare dare challenge with the other guy, who quickly noticed Lorne’s unwarranted glare and in just turn connected his glare with Lorne’s.

Although the game rule dictated that the onus is on Lorne to look away, both he and the other guy instead turned their heads to maintain the glare lock for as long as possible.

The other guy stopped while still staring at Lorne, then rhetorically asked agitatedly, “Do you have a problem, pal?”

“Yeah, I do,” Lorne replied, also agitatedly, as he always responded in such scenarios. “You’re staring.”

“You stared first, pal, and kept on staring,” the guy explained before stating his ultimatum. “So, either you walk away with your tail between your legs, or I bust your head.”

With the irony of his naked aggression and the crucifix’s intended symbolism of Christ-like sacrifice, compassion and pacifism apparently lost on him, Lorne grinned as he lifted his silver necklace and crucifix trinket and dropped them down the inside of his T-shirt just before doing his own explaining.

“You see, I need my specs to see the location of your face if I’m to beat it in; so, if you break them, I’m going to take out your two, upper front teeth with my ‘knuckle buster’ in recompense. I refer to it as ‘the break-even effect’.” Lorne, meanwhile, twisted from side to side a large chunk of silver ring on his forefinger; it indeed could easily enough break teeth, assuming it landed straight-on and hard enough. “Again, just so you’re clearly informed, I will not knock out your two front teeth, since they can be reinserted by any competent dentist; rather I’ll break each of the two, leaving their crooked stubs unbearably sensitive, thus you in great pain until they can be expensively capped.”

“Hey, dittos on that, pal,” the other guy responded to Lorne’s bold threat with his own smirk and twists of his gold ring, albeit clearly not as large as Lorne’s.

“Just so you’re clear, first I’m going to bust your ‘specs,’ then your two front teeth, then lastly your head.”

The guy then stepped up so close to Lorne, their faces were but five inches apart.

“It’s your move,” the guy informed Lorne, who fired back even more forcefully, “I never play white and move first. In a psychological sense, I perform far better when I play black and react.”

Each stared hard into the other’s eyes for about fifteen seconds before Lorne’s opponent chanced “playing white.” Giving Lorne a firm shove to his chest, causing him to slightly stumble backwards, Lorne quickly regained his footing position and returned the initiating assault, plus some interest.

And that was it.

Throwing a lightning headlock onto Lorne, the guy knocked his glasses a half-dozen feet to where stood gawking bystanders, which consisted of both the bloodthirsty and the bewildered. Exacerbating Lorne’s fast-paced losing status were the guy’s four blows to Lorne’s face, one of which would leave Lorne with a day-after shiner.

But that was when the winning/losing status briefly changed as do so many such fights go, for Lorne ‘saw red’—not red as in blood (not quite yet, anyway), but red as in his own blind rage. He so very suddenly forced his own head out of the guy’s oppressive arm wrap, the guy barely blinked before finding his head held down firmly in a damaging position. With the guy’s head held tight by the hair within Lorne’s unrelenting grasp and having received a steady lightening succession of seven uppercuts, all was halted by a couple of large-guerrilla Good Samaritans. Indeed, their intervention spared Lorne’s brief nemesis from receiving—besides his bloodied nose, a split lip and facial lacerations (the latter mostly due to Lorne’s huge ring—a further hammering to his entire head, accompanied by the bouncing about within his skull of his brain.

“Mind your own business, you fucking assholes!” Lorne, breathing a bit heavy, blared at the self-anointed referees, before he again bellowed, “Are you only going to stick your big noses in the ring when I’m on top with the advantage?!”

“Hey—enough’s enough,” insisted one Samaritan, holding out to Lorne his glasses, intact. “You’ve bloodied him up. What more do you feel the need to prove?”

“Well, he moved first—he shoved me!” Lorne retorted. “The next move, and maybe even the last move, is therefore rightfully mine.”

The Samaritan then went silent for a few seconds while looking down at Lorne’s T-shirt, precisely where his crucifix-trinket necklace was hanging just minutes prior.

“I noticed you hiding your ‘Christianity’ under your shirt when … ”

“I’m not ‘hiding’ it,” Lorne interrupted. “I put it there so it wouldn’t get snapped off my neck. It’s too expensive for me to fix every time I get into … whatever.”

“But why do you even wear it? You’re obviously not a follower of Christ’s teachings, especially the true pacifism.”

“I wear it first and foremost as jewelry and, secondly, as a symbol of what I’d attempt to be, had I it in me what one needs to even bother trying.”

And that was definitely one of those times that Lorne was a million miles away from being Christ-like, a great state of real humane being that the silver trinkets typically signified.

Although he insidiously motioned via his body language that he was calming down, Lorne instead leapt at the already injured guy, who was busy wiping the drying blood from his face, and sucker punched him into his temple.

However, the guy himself then instantly saw more red than the small stain of dried blood on the back of his hand. He lunged into Lorne’s lower torso, forcing Lorne’s back hard into an adjacent cement-block wall.

Immediately, the guy, armed with his 10K gold ring, powerfully thrust his fist into Lorne’s mouth, which procured a notable crack, with the latter’s head thrown backwards into the cement-block wall.

Both having stopped to catch their breath, Lorne could be seen feeling with his tongue what was left of his left, (upper) front tooth.

“Ooww! Shit !” he pretty much squealed, just before again emphasizing the excruciating hit-a-nerve pain inside his mouth. “Ooww! Fuck me!”

Lorne then felt the stub of his half-tooth with his finger to confirm what he readily expected.

“My tooth’s broken,” he noted the obvious, prior to inadvertently sucking cool air into his mouth, thus again igniting a hit-a-nerve sensation within the broken tooth’s stub like a firecracker. “Oh, fucking Moses!!” he bellowed, placing his hand over his throbbing mouth.

“Fuck this!” declared Lorne, succumbing to his ‘victorious’ foe. “I’m outta here.”

From appearances, Lorne indeed did walk away with his figurative tail between his legs; he was the one whose tooth got knuckle busted.

But I’m gone just for now, he mentally noted. I’ll swallow my pride and not focus on my anger or need for vengeance.

Actually, as it turned out, Lorne henceforth went about making stare dare challenges—or not—strictly according to such dares’ just rule.

[Frank G Sterle Jr, April 2013]

Perhaps a High Too Pure for His Comfort

(The following is essentially factual yet not intended to be religiously testimonial.)

JAKE was a bad example of how any man should behave, especially towards his wife (or significant other). Instead of being a good husband, he continuously berated his wife, Kate — a devout Pentecostal — even occasionally while in the presence of visitors, such as Jessie and his mother Marge (who was Kate’s longtime friend). Marge reared Jessie as a Catholic, though he wasn’t that much of a ‘believer’ in any faith.

“Ahh, shut your goddamn, filthy mouth!” Jake maliciously, repeatedly, sometimes unrelentingly spewed at his supposed-to-be life partner. Wife Kate would then say a few relatively benign things about this or that, and again out of his foul mouth came, “Ahh, shut your goddamn, filthy mouth!”

To be fair, it should be known that Jake didn’t indulge himself in vices, not even alcohol. On a few occasions, however, he did help himself to the two prepubescent sisters who resided a few houses away and confided in Jessie about the old man’s “tummy tickling” them. It was still considered acceptable behavior back in the 1970s.

As for the venomous verbal assaults against his wife, his cardiovascular system could tolerate only so many years of such blood-pressure-boosting, anger-based emotional abuse of Kate. One day his heart gave out. Though lucky enough to have survived, he remained wheelchair bound — physically, emotionally, mentally and thus verbally as weak and helpless as a kitten. Henceforth, he didn’t say a single nasty word to Kate, who went on to love and nurse Jake, whilst he sincerely discovered the same Christian faith as she.

Somewhat poetically, the only filthy mouth that would be profoundly shut, or at least very much mellowed, was that of Jake’s.

Following that great humbling and weakening, another devoutly Pentecostal elderly husband and wife, whom Kate met at church a couple years before, felt comfortable enough in her residence, due to the noticeable absence of Jake’s former typically malicious character, to regularly visit. And when came time for the closing of each stay, they all held hands in a circle as the senior male visitor initiated intense, deep prayer.

Though Marge had joined in the prayer circles a few times before, it was the first (and, incidentally, last) time Jessie had been present, albeit at the other side of the living room. To the barely seventeen years of age boy, the old man was simply emphatically, almost comically, rambling on in some indiscernible words for about forty-five seconds.

As he sat there, Jessie unexpectedly and inexplicably felt very relaxed, light minded and what he could only describe as a sense of clean spiritedness.

Later, on their way home from the visit, he told his mother that it was the most profound sensation he’d ever experienced (which said a lot, he thought to himself, considering the various drugs he had tried and planned to continue trying).

“He was speaking in tongues,” she bluntly informed him. “As funny as it sounded, he was rebuking evil spirits and inviting a holy spirit. I feel the same thing, like a pure euphoria, every time I’m a part of it.”

As it were, it would be but a one-time encounter for Jessie. He feared that further joining the Pentecostal prayer circles would interfere with his guilt-free enjoyment of the illicit intoxicant party life with the usual circle of rowdy friends. And he made sure none of them would ever learn of his involvement, however brief, with the speaking-in-tongues euphoria-feeling gathering, lest they laugh the hell out of him.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

In All Due Fairness

LISTENING to her teenage daughter’s recorded screams, the distraught mother could not contain her grief. With heaving sobs, she stood to leave the courtroom, only to have her weakened knees buckle and collapse onto the courtroom floor.

Gasps came from many spectators (some others she’d suspected to be but voyeurs), as the bailiff, district attorney, and even defense council, rushing to assist the bereaved woman. Slowly, gently facilitating the trembling frail woman to her feet, the three courtroom officials somehow misperceived stability in her pale expression and gradually pulled away their hands. But she was so shaken by the prosecution’s key evidence — that of the accused’s own trophy audio-video of her only child’s last tortured hours alive — she fell hard, flat unconscious.

The night she was kidnapped, the desperate mother had locked her daughter out of the house in an attempt to correct the otherwise average girl’s increasing tendency to breach curfew. It was the first (and tragically final) time the mother had, still with much reluctance, attempted such a tough-love measure. Only it had gone the most horribly wrong.

By all accounts, the mother had been a fine parent, as was the girl’s father; although he, until then healthy, had died suddenly of a massive coronary less than a month after his “little princess” had been prolongedly tortured, then murdered in the worst way.

The girl’s assailant had caused her all the real hell any parent wishes against their child ever having to nightmare about, let alone actually instinctively enduring for the sake of surviving the atrocity, only to be snuffed out at day’s end anyway.

And that appeared to have been the last straw. …

Suddenly everyone on Earth was aware of an unprecedentedly profound Great Change, and one that would become a far better existence than just moments before. The planet-wide awakening was a massive shift that would finally find favour for the most materially, physically, mentally and spiritually poor people of all.

For starters, every fortunate person was forced, as though by true magic, to empathically share in the anguish suffered by the greatest life-sentence affliction that Fate can cruelly, yet with cold apathy, reserve for a parent — a child lost to a torturous death. Now all bore a tiny portion — thus one sometimes imperceivable — of that enormous emotional turmoil otherwise suffered solely by those individuals who’d received the lottery-jackpot-odds lousiest of parental luck.

In rehabilitative return, those most unfortunate parents who’d suffered such unjust extreme loss, inexplicably felt very great relief from their overwhelming affliction. Their trembling hands slowly left their tear-streaked faces, for their heavy hearts no longer suffered the agony alone.

With the supernatural change, however involuntary, when all shared in such a terrible personal toll, it became a literal — rather than just the common figurative — sharing of grief. It was analogous to a fiscally imprudent national government that had invested a large sum of treasury funds into an eventually losing deal; but with the shortfall shouldered by the large collective citizenry, the burden on the individual taxpayer was so much greatly lessened, if not unnoticeable.

Rather than being specific thought invasively transmitted and received, it was loosely comparable to an expecting husband’s sympathy pains suffered for his greatly labouring pregnant wife.

Even academics agreed it was akin to everyone having been spontaneously cerebrally re-hardwired to literally share in others’ dreadful suffering, like so many undisturbed antennas suddenly receiving the immensely distressed signals from a few isolated agonized antennas.

Most assumed the change was implemented by a kindly sentient omnipotent source. This was defined by monotheists as God, and by polytheists as multiple powerful spirits; while others believed greatly advanced caring alien-race monitors were responsible. Many secular humanists theorized it was simply the good within humankind itself psychically coming to long-overdue overpowering conscience terms with the disproportionate injustices suffered by some but not by most others.

Of course the change was also well received by many other worldwide examples of disproportionate suffering, notably that of desperately poor citizens of developing nations wanting for the most basic of life’s necessities. Indeed, great empathic relief was felt long before the arrival of overflowing shipments of water purification devices, as well as the exponentially larger quantities of food and medicine than ever before — all gratefully given by the prosperous nations because the planet’s privileged people were abruptly enduring what had consumed the world’s most needy for far too long. And in return, the fortunate givers felt physically and mentally so much better.

Although initially the otherwise fortunate felt indignant by the change, that they’d done nothing personally wrong to justify the unfavorable empathy, soon it no longer felt like an imposition but rather a universal effect in which all were naturally wanting to treat all affliction, just as though it was in fact one’s very own turmoil. And contrary to the usual human-history pendulum swing of ideological and political mood, the Great Change was a permanently solidified authentic sense of others’ upheaval, therefore no chance would remain of all reverting to the unjust existential norm of yore.

[Frank G Sterle Jr, 2008]

Forced to Step Outside of My True Pacifist Nature, Part 1

THE Laser Palace arcade, though a few mocked it as the Loser Palace, was well-occupied that afternoon, and being a wet day exacerbated the humidly stuffy atmosphere within. Nevertheless, upon entering I went straight for the Space Shuttle pinball machine and plugged in the requisite two bits. Removing my worn, wool insulated, denim jacket, I noticed Barney standing next to an adjacent video game, staring at me.

What’s his problem? went through my mind, as well as some concern.

Returning my attention to my pinball machine and pressing the start button, Barney spoke: “Michelson was up here, and he’s looking for you,” he informed me, a little too gleefully for my comfort. “He’s drunk.”

John Michelson was a tough-guy wannabe, known to get drunk and then into street fights; it was even alleged that he was an “experienced” fighter while under the influence of moderate amounts of alcohol.

“Thrills,” was my brave façade response. However, the truth was, I really wasn’t into a physical confrontation, and I began to wish I’d stayed home that bleak weathered Monday afternoon.

Barney—a.k.a. “Burney,” because of his propensity towards selling underweighted cannabis allotments—was a smalltime, small hearted drug dealer. His faded denim upper and lower body attire plus weather-beaten Dayton boots, all complimented by his scraggly head hair, did everything but make him look the least bit trustworthy. Just his rowdy, worn out appearance alone should’ve served to warn those of a pacifist predisposition to not deal with him, for he simply couldn’t be counted upon to practice business ethics of the scrupulous sort.

As for John and his dealings at the time, he was facing a likely four years of jail time for rape, and he was ‘living it up’ while free on bail pending a ruling on a defense motion for the judge to grant him an appeal of his conviction. His friend Greg, and his own older brother Rod, I’d heard, testified for the prosecution against John in exchange for reduced sentences for themselves. (The victim testified that the three, without doubt extremely intoxicated, assaulted her after they picked her up hitchhiking.)

Not wanting to be obvious about my intimidated mindset by leaving the arcade too soon, I decided that I’d leave after a game or two. Or so I thought.

About five minutes into my game (I was doing well on that pinball machine for a change, just my luck), within my peripheral vision I could see the door open; sure enough it was John. But just as quickly as he’d entered, he’d disappeared amongst some video games. Where in hell did he go? I thought, my adrenalin flow increasing.

The next thing I knew, he was standing behind me at my four o’clock, and I could smell the liquor on his breath.

(It’s noteworthy that I was at a crossroad in my troubled youth at which point I was just beginning to stand up for myself against bullies and other wannabe-tough-guys-at-others’-expense skid folk.)

“Let’s step outside,” he immediately insisted.

“When I finish my game,” I countered, still attempting to maintain a confident demeanor.


JOHN and I went back about three years, though we only knew each other by looks. The first time I came across him, I was walking along Marine Drive by the White Rock pier one summer day in 1982, as he was walking in my direction accompanied by two younger boys (one likely was his younger brother Gerald, and both appeared to be in admiration of the bigger John). As they approached me and passed by, John gave me a nasty look. Not wishing to initiate a physical confrontation via the always risky ‘stare-dare challenge,’ I returned my gaze back to straight ahead.

It would be about two years later that John would unconvincingly behave courteously towards me, as though he’d never seen me before. Initially, I theorized that perhaps his chivalry was at least in part due to the two new friends—beholders of renown no-nonsense attitudes and respectable reputations as true-to-their-nature tough guys—with whom I’d begun associating.

Consequently, I presumed that John, unlike that first time by the White Rock pier, no longer had a problem with my presence.

It indeed seemed to be as such, until I persistently refused to “front” John twenty-five dollars (i.e. pay first, and then hopefully receive your cannabis soon-enough after his disappearance) for a supposedly real eighth-of-an-ounce plastic sandwich baggie of cannabis. He adamantly felt that I should trust him with my money as he’d disappear between some houses, allegedly to the residence of some super-paranoid-as-per-usual drug dealer who supposedly refused to face most of his customers.

Regardless of his assurances that there was nothing for me to worry about, I nevertheless insisted, though to no avail, that I go along with him and (most importantly) my money into the presence of the dealer. Soon after that unfortunate disagreement, my then closest friend informed me that John was well-enough known to, at the least, pinch a couple joints’ worth of cannabis for himself or even go as far as help himself to all of the cash or cannabis.

As it happened, following that incident John decided that, like old times, he didn’t like me after all, therefore he commenced erroneously, maliciously propagating around the scummier side of town that I was in fact a police informant or “a rat.”

If Frank isn’t an informant, he wouldn’t insist upon coming with me to the dealer, was his flawed yet self-serving logic.

It wasn’t long before he and a couple of his ‘tough guy’ friends expressed their contempt for me one Saturday night by throwing little pieces of rolled-up paper at my head while I was racking up yet another top score on the Star Wars video game (naught but an enough-practice-makes-perfect accomplishment though nonetheless seemingly earning me even more contempt from the trio). But what was I to do—try fighting off all three scumbags? Not bloody likely, for John alone was enough for me way back then.

A day later, I was drinking a mickey of Southern Comfort at the same said closest friend’s residence, with the previous night’s unmerited bullying I’d endured lingering in my thoughts. With the liquid courage alcohol consumption increasingly motivating me to express my anger and requisite physical vengeance, I foolishly decided to even the score with my nemesis. By the time we’d driven uptown to the arcade, I was as obnoxiously cocky and extensively motor-functional disorientated as a drunk could be—and I’d end up receiving a bruising for it.

I went inside the Laser Palace and called him out onto the paved parking lot. Once outside, with a dozen or so onlookers from the arcade around us, things got physical, with me monopolizing the receiving end of the action.

For a short period of time, perhaps six to eight weeks following the altercation, I felt psychologically as well as physically emasculated by his presence; meanwhile he, on the contrary, doubtlessly felt superior. But it didn’t take me very long to rebel against that strong sense of subservience, and I began giving him dirty looks. More so, the occasion would soon arise whence I even gave him an unmistakably firm shoulder bump as we passed each other on my way from the Laser Palace to the local Muffin Break coffee shop.


“NOT good enough!” was John’s silent yet quite physical response, as he suckered me. It was clearly an impaired, clumsy attempt at getting me into a solid headlock, for I readily slipped my head out from his clasping arm. He nevertheless continued his attempt at wrestling me into a position favorable to him, all occurring as physically debilitating dreadful thoughts raced through my mind. Perhaps the most intense stomach-turning thought was the one undoubtedly from within my defeatist psyche; the one which readily let me know as I was hit two or three times that I was in a very bad situation and place infested with malicious people who held naught but considerably ill will towards me and my presence—the latter which only further debilitated any defensive moves to which I may have otherwise had access. (It would be three decades later that I’d read George Orwell’s 1984 in which the narrator at one brief point seemingly curses “the treachery of the human body which always freezes into inertia at exactly the moment when a special effort is needed.” To this day, I’ve yet to meet anyone who’ll discuss the meaning to him/her of the abovementioned treacherous mind over matter, especially when it comes to unrestrained debilitating fear. Although, it seems that Orwell would’ve likely been able to relate to what I experienced that violent day at the Laser Palace arcade.)

We landed on the barely carpeted, cement-based floor and tussled for but a moment, each determined to get on top of the other thus gaining dominance. Fortunately, I got him on all fours, with my right knee pressed down onto his back. “Now it’s your turn,” I said as I initiated repaying his assault, directed to his head. However, with a sudden burst of kinetic energy, he threw his body mass upwards and me off of his back.

John’s friends and allies took him outside to wait for me as he took in some fresh air. I, on the other hand, remained inside, with my then-boney legs feeling like they were about to buckle. I soon began futilely squinting about the floor for my glasses, which I’d eventually reacquire two days later, all twisted up and useless, except for a few spare parts for future specs requiring them.

[His friends and allies were pretty much the same lot of (what I’d privately referenced as) North, Central and South Surrey scum whom I’d get nauseated quietly listening to, especially the grinning brags about sexual conquests, both actual and wishful; the same recklessly condom-less phallus-armed conquesteers to whom, a week earlier, I’d finally raised the real risk of their ‘knocking up’ one or more of those conquests, along with the very serious consequences of doing so for the girls and infants (if the pregnancies are carried to term) — all for maybe 30 seconds of boy pleasure; and the same thoughtless inconsiderates who, in turn, looked at me, then at each other, then again at me with the incredulous look of having had their parade pissed on by an insignificant like me. One uttered, seemingly on behalf of the entire lot of boasting boys, “What are you, some kind of homo?” Of course I didn’t repeat the lecture, however brief it was, on the morals of their feel-good philosophy with the potential human collateral damage when the selfish ideal is implemented. Instead, I asked them whether they would first go down on their sex partners, which was the least they could do for the girls.

Before they could react, I quickly told them I had heard from an older male that, if performed properly, there was nothing like the erotic power of making your mate lose herself in a frenzy of unsurpassable pleasure. As her partner, you have this control that’s quite consensual; she’s clearly more than happy to share the experience that can be orgasmic for her and enjoyable for him, even though he may be keeping his pants on. It sounded to me, albeit young and unexperienced, better than the speed humps, which were the equivalent of these guys masterbating inside the girls, from which the latter were likely getting very little or no sexual satisfaction. Similarly, gals can get off from the erotic power when going down on their guys (not to mention the additional power from her potentially clenched teeth). According to what had been related to me, it could be fantastic for both parties, I frankly stated. But to this they collectively gave the typically unthinking laugh-cringe response, “Gross! No way!” The lot’s spokesman again asserted himself, with the rest nodding in agreement: “I’ll get her to go down on me.” … I then briefly contemplated relating to them how, according to what I’d read, the bloody loin cloths of the fertile females of ancient Egyptian royalty were happily washed by their servants, both male and female. The servants considered it to be an honor, since the menstrual blood signified that which is procreatively precious, indeed godly.]

I had fear in my heart, while his held drunken rage within. The two extreme opposite ends of the psychological/emotional spectrum greatly interact thus feed from and get depleted by one another; thus, each is increasingly intensified and usually results in one triumphant winner and one lacerated loser.

About ninety seconds later, John walked back in and towards me with his forefinger motioning me to, “Come here, Frank.”

“No way, man,” I declined, waving my hands in the negative as he approached me. He then began angrily rambling incoherently about my ‘offenses’ committed against him, though in reality all being either just alleged or in factuality.

Perhaps feeling confident that I wasn’t going to strike back judging by the panic likely showing in my eyes, he laid one on my left cheek. But my unpredictable hair-trigger-fury-when-hit reflex, rather than any fear I had felt, fully revealed itself and dictated my temporary ‘psycho’ physical response to his surprisingly weak blow. As his arms covered as much of his face as possible to block my rapid succession of uppercuts, our ‘winning/losing’ roles up till that point were already shifting: I had become the aggressor while, it appeared, he became the stunned and much less presumptuous.

By utilizing the derogatory term ‘psycho’ to describe my very rare mental state, even during such a horrible experience, I’m expressing how some altercation spectators perceived me when I so dramatically lost my temper composure control the instant that an angry, rambling John blatantly drifted me one to the cheek. In fact, I discovered exactly what was/is meant by the phrase, “I saw red” or “seeing red,” for that’s what I saw—just like a very light red tinted, transparent filter instantly placed over each eye’s pupil. ….

Personal essay concluded in Part 2

(Originally written 1992-93. The encounter occurred in 1984, at age 17.)

(Frank G Sterle Jr)

Forced to Step Outside of My True Pacifist Nature, Part 2 (Conclusion)

DURING my troubled teen years of the 1980s I observed that by ‘swinging first’, in general, a person potentially places himself (or herself) in an unanticipated psychological disadvantage—one favoring the combatant who chooses to patiently wait for his opponent to take the first swing, perhaps even without the fist necessarily connecting.

Just having the combatant swing at him before he’d even given his challenger a physical justification for doing so seemed to instantly create a combined psychological and physical imperative within to react to that swung fist with justified anger. In fact, such testosterone-prone behavior may be reflected in the typically male (perhaps unconsciously strategic) invitation for one’s foe to ‘go ahead and lay one on me’, while tapping one’s own chin with his forefinger.

Yet, from my experience, it’s a theoretical advantage not widely recognized by both the regular scrapper mindset nor general society. Instead of the commonly expected advantage of an opponent-stunning first blow, the hit only triggers an infuriated response earning the instigator two-or-more-fold returned-payment hard hits.

It brings to mind an analogous scenario in which a chess player recklessly plays white by rashly forcefully moving his pawn first in foolish anticipation that doing so will indeed stupefy his adversary.

I’ve theorized that it may be an evolutionary instinct ingrained upon the human male psyche—one preventing us from inadvertently killing off our own species by way of an essentially gratuitous instigation of deadly violence in bulk, which also results in a lack of semen providers to maintain our race. Therefore, in this sense, we can survive: if only a first strike typically results in physical violence, avoiding that first strike altogether significantly reduces the risk of this form of wanton self-annihilation. In other words, things should remain peachy when every party shows the other(s) proper, due respect. It’s like a proactively perfect solution.

It should also be noted, however, that on rare occasion (at least from my many years of observation) an anomalous initiator/aggressor will be sufficiently confident, daring and violently motivated, perhaps through internal and/or external anger, to outright breach the abovementioned convention by brazenly throwing the first punch(es). Perhaps with the logical anticipation, or hope even, that his conventional foe will physically respond in kind by swinging at or hitting him, the unprovoked initiator/aggressor will feel confident and angered enough to willfully physically continue, finishing what he had essentially inexcusably started. It was as though he had anticipated that through both his boldness in daring to throw the first punch and then furthermore finish the physical job he himself had the gall to unjustifiably start in the first place, he will resultantly intimidate his (though now perhaps already quite intimidated) non-initiator/non-aggressor foe into a crippling inferior sense of physical-defense debilitation, itself capable of resulting in a more serious beating received by that diminished non-initiator/non-aggressor party. Or, another possibility remains that the initiator/aggressor will be completely confident that when/if he strikes first and the non-initiator/non-aggressor responds with reactor’s fury, he, the initiator/aggressor will himself respond to that response with even greater fury thus physically/psychologically overwhelm the non-initiator/non-aggressor with a very unfortunate outcome for the latter party.

Regardless, it has always both bewildered and sickened me how a person can throw a serious punch without any physical provocation.


(Personal encounter resumed)

HAVING observed the said turn of events, the arcade attendant—short, but with a conspicuously heavy build (perhaps through steroid use, being in vogue back then)—jumped me from the side and held me to the floor. Again John went outside to await my eventual exit. When I did so only a couple minutes later, my exit was without choice, according to the attendant, who had intervened on a total of three occasions during that day’s arcade altercation by diving on me and only when I’d finally let loose on John.

I was outside for a few seconds before my debilitating fear again ridiculously turned me into a limp noodle, thus enabling him to easily throw me down onto the red brick walkway like I was naught but a ragdoll.

Immediately after dropping his knee onto my abdomen (or perhaps my chin, though I don’t recall feeling any notable impact, pain nor further facial lacerations), I threw a punch upwards that connected with his nose area but was too weak to draw any blood.

Separated once again, I then sufficiently sensed the thick air of contempt felt for me almost all around in order to walk away.

I walked away with my coat over my shoulder, a gash on my cheek and mangled glasses left behind somewhere inside the arcade. What a day, I thought, spitting out some reddish saliva, which was followed by my tongue sliding across my two loose upper-front teeth.

But it all wasn’t over, yet. “Frank!” came the cry from somewhere behind me. John was running towards me without his T-shirt, Clint Eastwood style, and closely followed by his mob-like supporters.

In necessary haste I scanned the large parking lot of an old strip mall across the busy main road, as though I was ludicrously seeking out the softest looking twenty-square-metre piece of decades-hardened pavement upon which to go yet another round. (As I ran to my choice of locale, I now believe, I may have disappointed some who would’ve taken pleasure in seeing me flee the entire scene.) There, I tossed my coat aside and watched the maniacal Eastwood charging at me.

With the arcade spectators right behind him, John stopped about a meter from me. He threw a fist and a kick at me with both off their mark, as I simply pulled back; however, his misdirected kick caused him to lose enough balance to fall upon his hands and knees. He obviously was wearing thin, tiring and losing body co-ordination, all at an increasing rate.

Of course I wasn’t at all in a merciful mood after having to deal with such an obnoxiously inebriated, violent punk and to such a nasty degree. I physically explained to him that he should’ve remained back at the arcade or very near it.

My succeeding kick into his horizontally orientated abdomen was easy yet satisfying. I went down on my knees, awkwardly wrapped my left arm around his head and face then began delivering for a second and final time a succession of rapid uppercuts to his face, which that time wasn’t blocked at all by anything.

In turn, perhaps intended to literally cost me a digit, he bit into my forefinger, since my left hand’s fingers happened to be gripping that area of his face. As he bit with increasing jaw strength, I transferred the pain to my finger to the intensity of and rate at which my right fist delivered additional uppercuts.

It was somewhat like a who’ll-blink-first standoff—which of us could endure the most intensifying assault, for the longest time.

Biting into my finger as hard as he could, he seemed to realize that he was getting by far the worst of the trade-off and threw himself upwards sufficiently forceful to throw me off, causing me to lose balance and land on my back.

As I lay there vulnerable, he attempted to gain total advantage by solidly positioning himself above my head and shoulder region. However, as he tried to get around my feet, repeatedly dodging left to right then back again, I rotated my grounded body so as to kick him away if he tried to get close enough to evade my feet.

Luckily, the embarrassing conduct lasted no more than fifteen seconds before some older, larger guy brought it all to a halt.

I suggested that we settle any remaining differences another day, which never did come, with nothing but silence from John.

Re-engaging my walk away home, I looked at my bloodied finger and noticed that, ironically, John had viciously bitten square on and deep into a large wart thus permanently annihilating it.

With many townsfolk eyes witnessing the ugly violence, not to mention my lacerated face, the police not surprisingly were summoned. The police officer who’d intercepted me with his cruiser made a notable effort to be sympathetic while insisting that I go to the emergency ward of the local hospital to be checked out for any unseen physical trauma (e.g. brain hemorrhage).

Once there, given the doctor’s O.K. and feeling somewhat foolish, I went through some tedious paperwork with a staffer. All the while I couldn’t help but repetitiously wonder how in hell I got into such a mess—as though it was my blunder or character flaw that was at fault.

Leaving the hospital, though, I once again was forced to endure John’s (fortunately very brief) presence, for he was taken to the hospital by another officer shortly after I’d arrived. John sat slumped forward in a wheelchair, his head hanging down as though he’d passed out. It then fully dawned on me that he was the reason I was at the hospital and faced with the prospect of a catastrophizing, overemotional mother greeting me in shock when the officer drove me home.

“Goof!” was the last and only thing that I’d say to him as I, flanked by the officer, left the hospital. (Yes, I did see him one last time as we exchanged a stare dare glare one day by the beach front adjacent to the White Rock pier—in fact, just meters from the very spot where he’d given me that first ugly look and, as chance would have it, a blatant stare dare likely for no other reason than just to be a tough guy in the eyes of a couple kids.)

“You know, you can always lay assault charges,” I was informed by the officer, who’d learned from some honest source which of us had indeed instigated the brawl. “But from what I’ve seen, he got the worst of it.”

“Nah,” I replied, still picturing Mom suffering a large stroke when she’d see my face, no matter who “got the worst of it” or the least. “Just let it be.”

(The Laser Palace arcade was shut down only days later by a Surrey city council greatly embarrassed by and therefore fed up with all of the criminal activity frequently occurring there. The fight was simply the cliché straw that broke the camel’s back. About two weeks after the fight, I was attacked by a girl who thought much of John and therefore not much about me telling her that I’ve been told he’d gotten the worst of the altercation. Also, I was told by a good-ally friend of mine, who unfortunately for me numbered quite few back then and there, that John’s father—who was somewhat known for physically expressing his significant displeasure towards any son of his who bore a shiner, etcetera—smacked him around shortly after the arcade incident.)

(Frank G Sterle Jr)

Earth Day Too Quickly Followed by Business-As-Usual Distractions and Denial

I’ll never forget reading the unsigned editorial that a local B.C. community newspaper printed just before Earth Day 2017, titled “Earth Day in need of a facelift”. Varied lengths of the same editorial was also run by other community newspapers, all owned by the same news-media mogul, who’s also an aspiring oil refiner. It opined that “some people would argue that [the day of environmental action] … is an anachronism,” that it should instead be a day of recognizing what we’ve societally accomplished. “And while it [has] served us well, in 2017, do we really need Earth Day anymore?”

I’ve never heard anyone, let alone a mainstream news outlet, suggest we’re doing so well as to render Earth Day an unnecessary “anachronism”. Considering the sorry state of the planet’s natural environment, I found it one of the most irresponsible acts of editorial journalism I’d witnessed in my 33 years of news-media consumption.

Thus, the aspect I like about social media in general is that it enables far greater non-gate-kept information freedom — particularly in regards to corporate environmental degradation — than that offered by what had been a virtual news/information monopoly held by the mainstream news-media, including that of print.

While I don’t know his opinion of social media, Noam Chomsky has noted that while there are stories published about man-made global warming, “It’s as if … there’s a kind of a tunnel vision — the science reporters are occasionally saying ‘look, this is a catastrophe,’ but then the regular [non-environmental pro-fossil fuel] coverage simply disregards it.”

Though it’s a couple decades late, I believe that progressive movements are far more effective with the unprecedented informative and organizational abilities made widely available by social media.


In Canada, we have a near-monopoly corporate news-media (i.e. Postmedia’s ownership/control of all-except-one major print publications) who are formally allied with one of the planet’s greatest polluting solid forms of “energy” and the most polluting form of crude oil — bitumen crude oil, a.k.a. tarsands.

During one of its presentations, it was stated: “Postmedia and CAPP [Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers] will bring energy to the forefront of our national conversation. Together, we will engage executives, the business community and the Canadian public to underscore the ways in which the energy sector powers Canada.”

Also, a then-publisher of a Postmedia national newspaper said: “From its inception, the National Post has been one of the country’s leading voices on the importance of energy to Canada’s business competitiveness internationally and our economic well-being in general. We will work with CAPP [Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers] to amplify our energy mandate and to be a part of the solution to keep Canada competitive in the global marketplace. The National Post will undertake to leverage all means editorially, technically and creatively to further this critical conversation.”

Although the newspaper giant’s apparent bedding with the powerful industry is not news and was downplayed by Postmedia itself, it’s little known amongst the general population. More so, should the promotion of massive fossil fuel extraction, even Canada’s own, at all be a partisan position for a newspaper giant to take? And, at least in this case, whatever happened to journalism’s role of ‘afflicting the comfortable’ (which goes along with ‘comforting the afflicted’), especially one of this scale of environmental monstrosity?

(Frank Sterle Jr.)