On the Autism Spectrum: Saddled Children Like Me

As a boy with an undiagnosed autism spectrum disorder — not to mention high sensitivity and resultant also-high adverse childhood experience score — my Grade 2 teacher was the first and most formidably abusive authority figure with whom I was terrifyingly trapped.

I cannot recall her abuse in its entirety, but I’ll nevertheless always remember how she had the immoral audacity — and especially the unethical confidence in avoiding any professional repercussions — to blatantly readily aim and fire her knee towards my groin, as I was backed up against the school hall wall.

Luckily, she missed her mark, instead hitting the top of my left leg. Though there were other terrible teachers, for me she was uniquely traumatizing, especially when she wore her dark sunglasses when dealing with me.

But rather than tell anyone about my ordeal with her and consciously feel victimized, I instead felt some misplaced shame: I was a ‘difficult’ boy, therefore she likely perceived me as somehow ‘deserving it’.

I was much too young to perceive how a regular-school environment can become the traumatizer of susceptible children like me; the trusted educator indeed the abuser.

Perhaps not surprising, I feel that school teachers should receive mandatory ASD training. There could also be an inclusion in standard high school curriculum of child-development science that would also teach students about the often-debilitating condition (without being overly complicated).

If nothing else, the curriculum would offer students an idea/clue as to whether they themselves are emotionally/mentally compatible with the immense responsibility and strains of regular, non-ASD-child parenthood.

It would explain to students how, among other aspects of the condition, people with ASD (including those with higher functioning autism) are often deemed willfully ‘difficult’ and socially incongruent, when in fact such behavior is really not a choice.

And how “camouflaging” or “masking,” terms used to describe ASD people pretending to naturally fit into a socially ‘normal’ environment, causes their already high anxiety and depression levels to further increase.

Of course, this exacerbation is reflected in the disproportionately high rate of suicide among ASD people.

As for my own autism-spectrum disordered brain, I’m sometimes told, “But you’re so smart!” To this I immediately agitatedly reply: “But for every ‘gift’ I have, there are a corresponding three or four deficits.” It’s crippling, and on multiple levels!

While low-functioning autism seems to be more recognized and treated, higher-functioning ASD cases are typically left to fend for themselves, except for parents who can finance usually expensive specialized help. … But a physically and mentally sound future should be EVERY child’s fundamental right, especially considering the very troubled world into which they never asked to enter.

Largely as a result, I’ve suffered enough unrelenting ACE-related hyper-anxiety to have known and enjoyed the euphoric release upon consuming alcohol and/or THC. However, the self-medicating method I utilized during most of my pre-teen years was eating, usually junk food.

My daily lead-ball-and-chain existence consists of a formidable perfect-storm-like combination of ACE trauma, autism spectrum disorder and high sensitivity, the ACE trauma in large part being due to my ASD and high sensitivity.

Thus, it would be very helpful to people like me to have books written about such or similar conditions involving a coexistence of ACE trauma and/or ASD and/or high sensitivity, the latter which seems to have a couple characteristics similar to ASD traits.

The Autistic Brain fails to even once mention the real potential for additional challenges created by a reader’s ASD coexisting with thus exacerbated by high sensitivity and/or ACE trauma.

I also read a book on adverse childhood experience trauma [Childhood Disrupted: How Your Biography Becomes Your Biology and How You Can Heal] that totally fails to even once mention high sensitivity and/or autism spectrum disorder. That was followed by The Highly Sensitive Man, with no mention whatsoever of autism spectrum disorder or adverse childhood experience trauma.

I don’t know whether my additional, coexisting conditions will render the information and/or assigned exercises from such not-cheap books useless, or close to it, in my efforts to live much less miserably.

While many/most people in my shoes would work with the books nonetheless, I cannot; I simply need to know if I’m wasting my time and, most importantly, mental efforts.

ACE abuse thus trauma is often inflicted upon ASD and/or highly sensitive children and teens by their normal or ‘neurotypical’ peers — thus resulting in immense and even debilitating self-hatred and shame — so why not at least acknowledge that consequential fact in a meaningfully constructive way?

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

Few People Know or Care About the Man Behind that Great Book

I posted an essay on Reddit.com a couple years ago or so [a fairly close copy of which I’ve included below], and it promptly got deleted.

What really pissed me off was that it was wholly censored not by the automated filter, which promptly deletes material that specifically breaches clearly defined rules, but rather by a living ‘moderator(s)’ for the Lewis Carroll section within the website (a sub-site which, to me, read quite like Carroll fandom).

As punishment, I was banished from commenting or contacting anyone there — like I was some sleazy troll.

Apparently, it miffed a powerful Lewis Carroll enthusiast or two, there. And I was given no means of communicating with any of the Carroll-site ‘moderators’ in regards to the unjustified blatant censorship. I was accused of calling Lewis Carroll “a pedophile”.

In my mind, I had not, although the implication understandably could be perceived, especially by his defenders. At that point, I had mistakenly believed that a “pedophile” was consistently solely defined as a person who is physically sexually involved with a child.

But it actually is defined as “an adult who is sexually attracted to or engages in sexual acts with a child. (psychiatry) A person aged 16 years old or older who is mostly or only sexually attracted toward prepubescent children. [from 20th c.]” Another definition source has it as “a person who is sexually attracted to children.” Meanwhile, “pedophilia” is defined as “sexual feelings directed toward children.”

My post included factual information, mostly quotes with full citation, from academia and writers; it included different sources (pro, con and in between) on Carroll’s prolific proclivity for taking nude photos of little girls who trusted him.

Such photography is a plain, basically undisputed fact. However, while there may be strong suspicions he had done so, I have not read anything, including in his or others’ correspondence, about Carroll inappropriately touching his little girl “friends”.

The piece was the most journalistic and researched post I have seen on that website, yet I was brazenly told to “please do some actual research”.

Perhaps typically, there was/is no means by which to contact that Lewis Carroll subreddit’s gatekeeper on this (at least not anything that was made visibly available). Thus I was given no means by which to question the flagrant suppression. Where was I? China or Russia?!

I used to get comfortable to watch the weekend-long Great Books marathons on TLC, way back when it really was The Learning Channel and not its later form with so much schadenfreude content.

Besides Alice In Wonderland, I have four other collector’s editions of The Great Books series documentaries, albeit on VHS — Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Jonathon Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels, H. G. Wells’ War of the Worlds, and Herman Melville’s Moby Dick — all of which I’ve watched many times. [Of course, I’ve read the novels as well.]

(I’d like to get many of the others, like Plato’s The Republic and Sigmund Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams, but they are no longer available to me as The Great Books documentary videos.)

With all five documentaries, though especially with Alice In Wonderland, I took down notes and quotes almost every time I’d watch them, sometimes repeatedly rewinding and replaying to make sure of the notes’ accuracy.

While none of the documentary’s scholars are critical of Lewis Carroll, the most memorable for me are those who talk glowingly of the author while — unlike the vociferous in-denial critics of my Lewis Carroll essay — apparently having come to terms with his predilection for naked-little-girl photography.

One Lewis Carroll academic interviewed in the documentary defended him, talking about the author like he could do no wrong.

_________

[The essay…]

With celebrity sexual assault and harassment scandals flowing from the showbiz industry, some people (including one CNN-based commentator) wonder whether they’ll feel comfortable consuming quality products involving seriously offending entertainers and producers.

Meantime, some big-celebrity fans will continue viewing their favorites nonetheless, while others may indefinitely remain in denial, as superstardom’s brightness can be blinding — especially when the product becomes legendary.

(The late Michael Jackson’s questionable history of having young boy sleepovers at his Neverland Ranch, comes to my mind as a current example, because of the enormous organized vicious attacks via various media on anyone, including big TV producers, who dare suggest that the legendary pop-music artist was a pedophile. He simply was — and still is — that great and loved.)

As a pre-broadcast-era artist example, many people to this day have great difficulty accepting, or perhaps even caring, that acclaimed author Lewis Carroll — writer of the Alice In Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass children’s novels — enjoyed having little girls pose nude for his camera.

A few years ago, I asked four peers whether they were aware of this rather unorthodox photography hobby enjoyed by Carroll, penname of Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson. All four had no idea.

One, though, became agitatedly apologetic and diversionary in her defense of the author: “So what? Woody Allen had sex with his [adopted] daughter!” Another peer replied similarly.

Astounded, I felt sure they would not be so dismissive had they viewed just a few of the many shots of unnaturally seductive poses involving small child subjects. (The ones I saw left me disgusted.) Again, it seems few know or care about the real Lewis Carroll.

Acclaimed writer and commentator Will Self stated the conundrum thus: “It’s a problem, isn’t it, when somebody writes a great book but they’re not a great person.”

Some big-celebrity fans will continue consuming and defending their favorites nonetheless, while others may indefinitely remain in denial, as superstardom’s brightness can be blinding — especially when the product becomes legendary.

“[Carroll] would ask mama if it was alright for him to photograph the little girl; and later on he would ask if he could photograph her in a costume; and eventually he would work his way up like a lover to, if he could photograph the child in the nude,” says retired Temple University English professor emeritus Donald Rackin, in a Great Books documentary (a copy of which I own and watched many times to accurately record comments and information).

“We know that of course he was refused sometimes, but it was astounding how many mothers said, ‘go ahead’.”

Another Lewis Carroll academic theorizes that with Through the Looking Glass the author had himself in mind as the White Knight who rescues Alice as the pawn about to become a queen, an act that may represent the author’s love for little Alice Liddell that could never be formally realized.

Regardless, as a prestigious figure, instead of being reprimanded or thrown into a Victorian-era prison, he continued taking his child photos. Carroll’s ability to get away with his perverted predilection for such photography may have been but indicative of the societal entitlement he enjoyed, even as an oddball loner.

Says the documentary’s soft-spoken narrator, actor Donald Sutherland (who narrates the entire Great Books series): “His girl photos were troubling to some, pure genius to others … sensual portraits.”

Yet some feel Carroll was unfairly misunderstood. According to Hollywood Reporter guest columnist Will Brooker, who also authored Alice’s Adventures: Lewis Carroll in Popular Culture:

“Lewis Carroll is treated [by his critics] like a man you wouldn’t want your kids to meet, yet his stories are still presented as classics of pure, innocent literature … Compared to some of our celebrities — the sportsmen, film directors and singers who commit real crimes like assault and abuse and are still welcomed back by fans — Lewis Carroll was a regular saint.”

Possibly as the perspective of a man of the cloth, Carroll himself wrote down about his girl photo subjects, “Their innocent unconsciousness is very beautiful, and gives one a feeling of reverence, as at the presence of something sacred.” (Letters 381)

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

My Greatest Gift From Life—Some Day I’m Going To Die

[BEWARE POTENTIAL SUICIDE TRIGGER]

For many people, seemingly myself included, the greatest gift life offers is that someday we get to die.

I believe Sigmund Freud postulated that due to the general stressful nature of human existence, i.e. anxiety (“stimuli”, I believe he called it), the ultimate aim/goal of our brain/mind is blissful death. [The Sigmund Freud character in the 2011 film A Dangerous Method, muttered upon having a near-death experience, “How sweet it must be to die.”] …

And then there’s the following poem/prose I penned ….

_____

I awoke from another very bad dream, a reincarnation nightmare /

where having died I’m yet again being forced to be reborn back into human form /

despite my pleas I be allowed to rest in permanent peace. //

My bed wet from sweat, I futilely try to convince my own autistic brain /

I want to live, the same traumatized dysthymic brain displacing me from the functional world. //

Within my nightmare a mob encircles me and insists that life’s a blessing, including mine. //

I ask them for the blessed purpose of my continuance. I insist upon a practical purpose. //

Give me a real purpose, I cry out, and it’s not enough simply to live /

nor that it’s a beautiful sunny day with colourful fragrant flowers! //

I’m tormented hourly by my desire for emotional, material and creative gain /

that ultimately matters naught, I explain. My own mind brutalizes me like it has /

a sadistic mind of its own. I must have a progressive reason for this harsh endurance! //

Bewildered they warn that one day on my death bed I’ll regret my ingratitude /

and that I’m about to lose my life. //

I counter that I cannot mourn the loss of something I never really had /

so I’m unlikely to dread parting from it. //

Frustrated they say that moments from death I’ll clamour and claw for life /

like a bridge-jumper instinctively flailing his limbs as though to grasp at something /

anything that may delay his imminent thrust into the eternal abyss. //

How can I in good conscience morosely hate my life /

while many who love theirs lose it so soon? they ask. //

Angry I reply that people bewail the ‘unfair’ untimely deaths of the young who’ve received early reprieve / from their life sentence, people who must remain behind corporeally confined /

yet do their utmost to complete their entire life sentence—even more, if they could! //

The vexed mob then curse me with envy for rejecting what they’d kill for—continued life through unending rebirth. //

“Then why don’t you just kill yourself?” they yell, to which I retort “I would if I could. //

My life sentence is made all the more oppressive by my inability to take my own life.” //

“Then we’ll do it for you.” As their circle closes on me, I wake up. //

Could there be people who immensely suffer yet convince themselves they sincerely want to live when in / fact they don’t want to die, so greatly they fear Death’s unknown? //

No one should ever have to repeat and suffer again a single second that passes. //

Oh leave me be to engage the dying of my blight!

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

Trying to Permanently Cross Out His Personality Disorder, Borderline and All

“Borderline: (adjective) only just acceptable in quality or as belonging to a category … (noun) a boundary separating two countries or areas.” —The New Oxford Dictionary of English

I know you don’t mean to be that way, Gustavo, but you tend to have the kind of … of a very different personality that can cause others to dislike you, to reject you, or even get very angry at you; and I fear that someone might at some point in the future even physically assault you—perhaps going as far as killing you. I really don’t mean to upset you by saying all of that, but sometimes I really worry for you.”

On more than a few occasions Gustavo’s mother, with his father (and once even his sister) sitting nearby intently listening with equal concern, cautioned the boy of such potential social problems in his future. When she would talk to him about this reality it was never out of any argument induced frustration or insult since she felt only love and genuine concern for the seven-year-old. Although it might bring them but minimal comfort, if any at all actually, his parents frequently reminded themselves that he wasn’t in the least intentionally behaving in an antisocial manner. As an otherwise nice young boy, why would he willfully choose such a socially ostracized existence? they’d often rhetorically ask themselves. And one particularly so as a child with a Hispanic heritage that’s greatly outnumbered by the other cultures around him?

When at age ten he lost his father in a motor vehicle collision, Gustavo, perhaps to compensate for the enormous loss, became all the more emotionally bound to his mother and six-year-old sister. But that extra bond would cause him to suffer extra anguish upon bearing the additional devastating loss of his sister. Precisely on his seventeenth birthday as she and he were joking and eating pizza, he and his mother on very short notice discovered in stunned silence that the girl had in fact been mortally stricken with Stage 4 malignant cancer. Without any foretelling symptoms she collapsed unconscious on his bedroom floor, then fell into a coma upon arrival at the hospital. He and his mother were further utterly shocked to hear an hour later that, even as rare as were such cases as hers in which indicators of the illness go unnoticed until death is imminent, MRI scans had revealed that too many of her abdominal organs were already shutting down or very close to doing so as the final result of the rampantly metastasizing disease. In addition to their already great loss, Gustavo and his mother were devastated again by also being denied even just a conscious moment with her to say a brief goodbye. Nevertheless, they remained by her bedside as she lay comatose while on life support until she succumbed, one day short of eleven weeks after initially collapsing at home.

After a year of psychiatric hospitalization and every form of treatment available to her, including electro-convulsive therapy, Gustavo’s chronically depressed mother took her own life. He then himself briefly followed in her severely distraught path for the following six months, during which not only did he fare well by his regimen of antidepressant medication but he was also diagnosed as having Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).

The very day he was discharged from hospital, the painful memory of his sister and her death came to mind, though it was immediately followed by the words received by Harry Potter from his school headmaster Albus Dumbledore, at the end of the long story when both meet as spirits within some pure-white realm. “Do not pity the dead, Harry. Pity the living, and, above all, those who live without love.”

This quote made Gustavo consider something even further along the existential lines, before he began talking to his well-medicated roommate lying in the next bed over. “ … Anyways, I told my doctor that, yes, I believed her assurances that I should’ve died at least four dozen times over. But what still sincerely bothers me is that I genuinely don’t know whether to credit all of those very-low-odds survivals to the divine or the devil.” A moment of silence passed before he could hear his roommate begin slowly snoring, perhaps a ‘response’ close enough to what one of his apathetic high school peers would’ve offered, as though such nearly successful however inadvertent overdoses nowadays were common enough to rank them as not meriting much more concern than getting very ill from too much alcohol after some big party.

After permanently leaving the psychiatric ward, Gustavo, with his newly-discovered lifelong BPD condition in mind, reconsidered his recollectable past through the lens of someone with a recognized personality disorder. Gustavo’s retrospective analysis clearly revealed that beginning as early as age six, he never understood why so many of his school peers had avoided his company while some even openly expressed to Gustavo’s face their dislike for him. Such matters only worsened when he entered junior high school, which exacerbated his already hatched agitative tendencies to a point of unpredictable inappropriate anger, though particularly so on those rare occasions when he’d be left licking his wounds after a physical assault.

Not to be mistaken, Gustavo did have a lighter side, indeed one that craved to joke around, although virtually nobody in his auditory proximity would laugh at his unconventional humour; some people were even left embarrassed judging by their deafening silence—all of which resulted in a self-perpetuating non-sociable effect upon Gustavo, in fact making him even more withdrawn. Sometimes he’d even make abnormally awkward comments or similarly vocalize sarcastic and cynical remarks; however, he didn’t realize his lacking social skills until it was too late to perform adequate ‘damage control’ between himself and his peers. If Gustavo dared to socialize by way of talking and/or joking at some gathering, it would often turn out that others felt he should’ve kept quiet; but when he did keep to himself, that was no good either, for he’d be deemed ‘a bore’. It truly was a bitter no-win scenario for him.

As the following few years passed, it became painfully clear to Gustavo that as a young adult with a personality disorder (“Borderline” or not) his problematic dealings with potentially regular clients had pretty much eliminated any chance he ever had of, as planned, becoming a professional portrait painter, maybe even with his own studio. However, as matters stood he couldn’t even manage to sufficiently socially function with potential buyers in order to steadily sell his own oil painting creations, works that others in the portrait painter community assured him should in any event be regularly sellable fine fruits of his labour. Indeed it was due to his personality’s friction-prone nature with potential employers as well as people at social functions, Gustavo found himself without any practical option other than to seek whatever freelance work he could manage to acquire (usually by saying as little as possible to whomever he should avoid inadvertently offending). Of course typical freelance work wouldn’t pay him as well as would most consistent weekly-hours jobs, which usually also offered medical and other benefits, if he only had it within him to be a work-environment ‘team-player’ and thus capable of maintaining a functional-employee status.

Gustavo, still being in his early adult years, also curiously delved into metaphysical theory and teachings. There, he eventually found himself believing that his personality disorder’s negative, angry condition and therefore the resultant thoughts themselves were essentially polluting to some degree the socially functional positive thoughts and emotions of many people around him. He enthusiastically searched the Internet for metaphysical literature containing relevant experiment findings that demonstrated how a very sensitive meter could measure fluctuations in even the weakest electromagnetic field (EMF) emanating from any kind of life form. But far more significant, however, was the revelation that when a test-subject was in some manner and extent distressed, his or her EMF was also disrupted and thereby proportionally disturbed the EMFs of test-subject non-human life forms (both animal and plant, etcetera) within his or her vicinity. Not long afterwards it was also ‘revealed’ via metaphysical research that all life forms—though above all, human beings—are interlinked by way of their EMFs of varying intensities. Henceforth he found himself considerably concerned over what he truly believed amounted to “the EMF poison transmitted by my disordered personality”.

Only a few months later Gustavo yet again notably bucked the social norm by finding he could no longer take praise, not at face value, not at all; instead he’d greatly downplay if not outright negate any complimented achievement of his. The many people offering him the praise that he would basically reject were left feeling insulted, attributing such strange responsive behaviour to inconsideration if not downright rudeness on his part. In fact, the people complimenting him felt that by rejecting their praise he was by extension questioning their judgment of what constituted a job well done; either that or, worse, doubting their sincerity.

For example, when told how much weight he appeared to have recently lost, he was left frustrated by his conviction that, notwithstanding some loss of facial mass, it was only a fallacy created by a two-dimensional-like concealment of his true undesirable shape coupled with a somewhat diversionary effect caused by just the right clothing style, contour and colour. Indeed he felt so abnormally strong about it that he’d sometimes quote author Mark Twain’s insightful humor: “Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society.” Gustavo always kept that small piece of humour in mind, as he felt like a half-naked fraud whenever looking into his mirror wearing only his briefs, but the joke hit too painfully close to home for him to ever appreciatively chuckle. He knew that whenever he dressed just so in quantity and quality, aspects of his physique he found embarrassing from the testimony of his bathroom’s large looking-glass were deceptively concealed.

Also in retrospect Gustavo realized that over the years there were numerous misunderstandings over statements he’d made as well as his demeanor which resulted in some other people’s frustration and even agitation towards him. Thus with time those many misunderstandings became others’ unflattering misconceptions about him, all of which caused him a sizable dose of haunting shame. He considered the permanent social damage to be, as he phrased it with feelings of regret rather than any humour, “All bridge under the water”.

It was only a few months later that while using the library’s computer room he clashed with a man who had an obvious personality disorder which didn’t mix well at all with Gustavo’s own formidable aggressive tendencies—in fact it was an incident he’d decided at that time to not share with his psychiatrist. But before the conflict would occur that afternoon his pharmacist with whom he was quite familiar queried him for the first time, with a concerned curiosity, “Why are you always so angry, Gustavo? Really—why so angry?” Uncertain as to how to respond to such an unusual question put to him, Gustavo simply forced out a small grin and shrugged.

About a month after the library altercation that came so close to actual blows, it became clear to Gustavo that he had to have his Borderline Personality Disorder curse in its entirety—the problematic negativity and fluctuating aggressiveness—forced out of his mind and life to the maximum possible extent, if not somehow in totality. However, he’d soon learn that to achieve such a feat there would have to be a determined permanence on his part and one that would be his great act in the best interests of those functional thinkers around him (as well, of course, as his own peace of mind).

During his next appointment with his psychiatrist she suggested to Gustavo that what he likely had in mind was an invasive procedure called a post-hypnotic suggestion (PHS), which she generally supported though with the stipulation that he undergo the standard eight-month pre-hypnosis preparation.

During the actual procedure itself, which for him would be drug induced since he was clearly too tense to be mesmerized solely through verbal means, he’d receive a PHS that would command his subconscious mind to essentially void his otherwise entrenched disordered personality traits. Her warning to Gustavo, however, included the possible risks involved, most notable being that the greater access to the subconscious mind during hypnosis occasionally enables often-traumatic repressed emotions or memories to be brought to the fore. Yet all he could think about at that point was being truly free of the great flaws resultant from his disordered personality, especially those responsible for his seemingly irrepressible negative thoughts and anger fluctuations.

It was immediately then that the Star Trek: The Next Generation character (Mr.) Lt. Commander Data came to Gustavo’s mind—Mr. Data being a no emotions thus facially expressionless artificial intelligence android who’s programmed to perform a very large number of constructive functions while protecting all human life. But the A.I. Mr. Data does take on the rare though no less embarrassingly contradictory emotion when it suits an episode storyline’s required elements. Upon second thought, however, Gustavo considered whether he might even more so prefer coming out of his hypnotic state as a mind-at-total-peace Buddhist monk. But then Gustavo recalled how the Buddha had lately made his ‘questionable ethics list’ upon recently learning that the Buddha, the very symbol for the super-vegan faith, allowed followers of Buddhism to eat meat albeit with the specification that they not do the actual slaughtering.

Or maybe even better yet, he excitedly thought, I might come out like Mr. Spock. Mr. Spock being renowned for his Vulcan confidence though especially his calmly logical state of mind, Gustavo could picture himself advising his typically emotional human peers: “Really, guys, you must learn to govern your emotions. They will be your undoing.”

“I don’t care,” he told his psychiatrist, “I just want to do it.” He had already irreversibly resolved to have all of his BPD negativity and aggressiveness totally removed from his mind without any even mildly cynical thought-exception, so as he’d not ever again end up distressing any part of the lives of decent people who were probably already dealing or struggling with their own turmoil. “I believe that I’m a small portion of a significant flaw in humankind’s messed-up nature,” he continued. “That’s why I’m going to do my very best to cease and desist that terrible aspect of my personality (short of any self-destructive means, of course).”

Gustavo wasn’t even deterred by his psychiatrist’s forewarning assertion that although the PHS would all but with one hundred percent certainty neutralize the burdensome antisocial mentality aspects of his character, “Your mind, unfortunately, will just as likely not automatically replace that mental disarray with positive, happy notions and good feelings—which is what I believe you’re expecting by means of flawed deduction reasoning as the primary side effect of the post-hypnotic suggestion. In fact, the relatively few functional and positive thoughts and emotions that you currently do experience will gradually dissipate—they will go away—though I cannot say with any useful accuracy when and at what rate that dissipation will take place.”

After eight months of psychiatric preparation consisting mostly of in-depth counselling sessions Gustavo was deemed ready for his post-hypnotic suggestion, which was scheduled for just over two weeks hence. He was again forewarned that if all went accordingly the PHS would leave him in a psychological state comparable to that of potent relaxant sedation.         “Furthermore, I must again emphasize that the suggestion placed into your mind will leave you, in a manner of speaking, self-disallowed from further hostile thoughts, emotions and aggressive physical intentions on your part, even if you’re being brazenly provoked by another’s man’s assault on you; it will be quite the figurative declawing of the cat, which is why it’s of the utmost concern for us amongst a few other lesser concerns.”

Gustavo was nevertheless adamant: “I want to go ahead with it anyway. I truly feel that the benefits can only outweigh any negatives.” He was then handed a pen to sign the consent form written up in legalese specifically for his unconventional hypnosis treatment, relinquishing all rights to any potential future civil legal action should anything go seriously wrong.

Yet, it was exactly a week before the PHS was to take place that Gustavo—already in a bad mood over learning of a large rent increase that he could ill afford—lost his temper with his psychiatrist when she had once again made reference to his personality disorder as being Borderline, the official diagnosis designation she’d thought he had already fully accepted since receiving the formal Borderline Personality Disorder some four years prior. When he had sufficiently calmed himself to fully absorb all of her words, she explained in finer detail than ever before the purpose of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) including the term Borderline to describe his form of personality disorder, with which he appeared mostly contented. Basically, the BPD sufferer lives with his or her symptoms “more under the radar” thus just barely concealed from the majority-functional people around them.

Both doctor and patient went silent momentarily before Gustavo stated that he still felt the DSM’s Borderline aspect of his personality disorder remained somewhat misleading. He then deeply inhaled before exhaling with a sigh as he sarcastically note the incident in which he had dysfunctionally conflicted with another man of a difficult demeanor—“perhaps even another recipient of the ‘Borderline’ personality disorder—at a most  public location. “It was a borderline physical altercation, I guess one might call it, though it really seemed like matters just barely missed seriously spiraling out of physical control—something I’ve not had to deal with since high school. To me, that’s quite unnerving!”

Then in an incredulous tone of voice, Gustavo strongly implied that he, upon second thought, still required another, broader response. “That quarrel by itself is a very good reason why I have trouble buying the DSM line that I have some borderline personality disorder. After all, it’s actually a noticeable disorder of my personality, or at least that’s what I’ve been both implicitly and explicitly told throughout my life; apparently it’s one that has openly crossed over the borderline and into the realm of a real personality disorder. Why not have just told me something along the lines of, ‘It’s not quite yet a serious anti-social character dysfunction that’s potentially criminal in nature, therefore we’ll cross that bridge when your personality gets there.

At that point it can be reconsidered and relabeled as an actual personality disorder’? Why not just say something more meaningful like that?” he continued to vent. “Maybe the mental health profession should just collectively flat-out say to diagnosed BPDs like me, ‘As unflattering as it may sound, you do have a problem with your personality; you can even refer to it as a personality disorder, if you so desire, though some people may even go as far as saying yours is a lousy personality. Okay now, Gustavo, having dealt with that semantical unpleasantry, let’s talk treatment for your personality, which is border-lining along the disordered sort’.”

Clearly, the way he plainly saw it, if it’s notably burdensome to its bearer, it’s worthy of a diagnosis title that straightly refers to an actual clinical mental condition—not something that by its name says that the threshold or borderline separating the actual disorder from the bordering-disorder has not yet been at all crossed.

Having reached his zenith in accumulated frustration, Gustavo, in finality, blurted out that, “adding ‘Borderline’ to the ‘Personality Disorder’ is perhaps patronizingly comforting to some sufferers; otherwise sufferers such as myself will simply disregard the DSM and refer to themselves as having a personality disorder, plain and simple! …

And since we’re on the subject of platitudinous semantics, doctor, do you have any idea as to what the attempt at a cleverly alliterated prize title Courage to Come Back Award is exactly supposed to mean—or, maybe in this case, not mean? Is it perhaps inadvertently inferring to the rest of us mentally ill folk who don’t have quite enough courage yet to accomplish this great feat? Or could it have been titled that way, without sufficient consideration of other consumers, for the sake of catchy alliteration?!”

Following the hypnosis session Gustavo spent hours walking around town each and every day, sometimes even frequenting the same streets a dozen times during the same day, with many of the streets being completely unfamiliar to him, all as though he was exceptionally restless. He was asked by his psychiatrist as to the general nature of his thoughts and emotions since his PHS-session implantation, and, with his face for the first time totally void of any expression whatsoever,  he replied: “I guess typical unimportant things, like did my telephone bill payment pass through okay, as it’s always done. Stuff pretty routine like that. But what I’ve got now that I didn’t have before is an absence of bad ideas and feelings—really, an amazing freedom from anger, even with the false sense of a little drugged stupor that goes with it.”

But as Gustavo would’ve said pre-PHS, “Nothing good ever lasts.”

It was not even two months later that he was mortally assaulted by three young men awaiting a ride at the Metro bus exchange who he had recognized as old friends from high school, although they didn’t in turn recognize him at all. Due to their chemically induced incapacitated mental state Gustavo’s expressionless gaze at them, they’d later testify on their own behalf in criminal court, “threw us for a loop because at first he didn’t even say anything to us.” As anticipated by his psychiatrist, with the PHS having completely pacified him he wasn’t only free of angry thoughts and emotions, he had also gradually lost the ability to experience pleasant feelings and impressions. The result by extension of the said PHS side-effect was essentially a deadening of his pre-hypnosis normal facial muscle activity that would have accompanied such positive feelings, hence his automaton-like non-expressive look.

When the story broke the next day that Gustavo, the peaceable ‘newcomer’ to town, had been beaten to death, the bitter irony was not at all lost on those few people who knew him well. What made the matter all the more difficult to accept was that the vicious crime had tragically been committed against him by a trio of his former high school peers and good friends. On the courtroom stand each of the three distraught young men had emphasized that upon their initial confusion over his blank expression, they had taken great offense by it after having misinterpreted it as an expression of disrespect, if not plain contempt, towards them.

The three assailants’ public defender later claimed in court that her clients’ deadly aggression against Gustavo “should be considered in proper context, your Honour. As tragic as the victim’s death may be, the fact nonetheless remains that the victim had responded to the three defendants’ presence with nothing but an abnormal blank stare (supposedly due to the aftereffect of therapeutic hypnosis that the victim had undergone about a month prior), which, intended or not, suggested his insolence towards the defendants’ very presence.”

The Crown attorney, however, strongly objected to the defense attorney’s claims, emphasizing instead that such an “argument is hardly plausible considering that, according to bystanders’ testimony under oath here in court, the victim had almost immediately began doubting the accuracy of his recognition of the three defendants and therefore, audibly to all witnesses present at the crime scene, stated to the defendants that, quote, ‘I’m sorry—my mistake’.”

As it were, two days after their convictions for aggravated manslaughter the three assailants individually revealed that soon after sobering up in lockup the morning after the deadly assault, each finally could recall with reasonable clarity that the deceased Gustavo had in fact been a former high school chum with whom they’d not conversed nor could they recollect even seeing since graduation. They further could recall of him that no matter how hard he tried to blend in with his peers he seemed to almost always end up saying the wrong thing—unfortunately, in his case, he’d eventually say something to which some people would take considerable offense and for which they might even brutally assault him. 

[November 2013, Frank G Sterle Jr]

Every Day Really Needs to Be World Earth Day

Whenever I see footage of the earth from an orbiting source, I think I actually feel a sense of love for the planet below, everyone’s sole Spaceship.

Thinking about the awe experienced and even love felt by astronauts for the spaceship Earth below, I wonder: If a large portion of the planet’s most freely-polluting corporate CEOs, governing leaders and over-consuming/disposing individuals rocketed far enough above the earth for a day’s (or more) orbit, while looking down, would have a sufficiently profound effect on them to change their apparently unconditional political/financial support of Big Fossil Fuel?

We do know that industry and fossil-fuel friendly governments can tell when a very large portion of the populace has been too tired and worried about feeding/housing themselves or their family, and the continuing COVID-19 virus variants — all while on insufficient income — to criticize them for whatever environmental damage their policies cause/allow, particularly when not immediately observable.

Basic, commonsense dictates that it is no longer prudent to have so much of society, including our primary modes of transportation, reliant on traditional sources of energy. Maybe that’s largely why comparatively little of her has been published/broadcasted by the mainstream corporate news-media since COVID hit the world.

Even as bone-dry-vegetation regions uncontrollably burn, mass addiction to fossil fuel products undoubtedly helps keep the average consumer quiet about the planet’s greatest polluter, lest they feel and/or be publicly deemed hypocritical. It must be convenient for big fossil fuel.

The industry and friendly governments can tell when a very large portion of the populace is too tired and worried about feeding/housing themselves or their family, and virus-variant damage still being left in COVID-19’s wake — all while on insufficient income — to criticize them for whatever environmental damage their policies cause/allow, particularly when not immediately observable.

As a lifelong resident of southwestern B.C., I was left feeling I could never again complain about the weather being too cold after having suffered the unprecedented heatwave here in June 2021, described by meteorologists as a ‘stalling dome’ of high heat.

But then complain I somewhat did when most of the province, including southwestern B.C., suffered an unprecedently cold bunch of days in January, which was described by meteorologists as a ‘stalling dome’ of freezing cold. And I doubt it was just coincidental.

Thus, every day of the year desperately needs to be World Earth Day — but a serious effort rather than just brief news-media tokenism or even dismissal.

In an interview with the online National Observer (posted Feb.12, 2019), Noam Chomsky noted that while the mainstream news-media do publish stories about man-made global warming, “It’s as if … there’s a kind of a tunnel vision — the science reporters are occasionally saying ‘look, this is a catastrophe,’ but then the regular [non-environmental pro-fossil fuel] coverage simply disregards it.”

Not that long ago, I read a disturbing unsigned-editorial in a local newspaper, headlined “Earth Day in need of a facelift”. It opined that “some people would argue that [the day of environmental action] … is an anachronism,” that it should instead be a day of recognizing what we’ve societally accomplished. “And while it [has] served us well, in 2017, do we really need Earth Day anymore?”

Varied lengths of the same editorial, unfortunately, was also run by some sister newspapers, all owned by the same news-media mogul who also happens to be an aspiring oil refiner. …

Also, I’ll never forget the astonishingly short-sighted, entitled selfishness I observed about six years ago, when a TV news reporter randomly asked a young urbanite wearing sunglasses what he thought of government restrictions on disposable plastic straws: “It’s like we’re living in a nanny state,” he snorted. “They’re always telling us what we can and cannot do.”

His carelessly entitled mentality revealed why so much gratuitous animal-life-destroying plastic waste eventually finds its way into the natural environment, where there are few, if any, caring souls to immediately see it.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

Mental Block

“Block (noun) … a group of buildings bounded by four streets … [Or] an obstacle to the normal progress or functioning of something.”

—The New Oxford Dictionary of English

Seemingly so quiet, so still passed the days, the months, even years for the “semi-independent-living” young man dependent on the disability pension dole; peaceful and tranquil-ized was he due to mental health ministry medication and to all sides of his small apartment unit being occupied by the mellow elderly so still, so quiet—so seemingly solidly surrounded by serenely silent seniors …

Eventually came the new renters, however, young as was he but contrarily raucous as he was not, since out went almost all of the old folks, ‘homes’ they rented one-room or bachelor suite yet notably peaceable, quite content in their retirement or old age benefits; but it was public funding passed on to those needy next in line when came and went the passing of those elderly tenants who’d been to him so quiet, so still, during that earlier simpler time …

As the young people increasingly filled the vacated units also came their loudness readily through the paper walls and halls, their boisterousness abound in their gratuitously forceful TVs, radios and bass-beating music with little if any afterthought about the resultant aftershock from their disturbingly distracting clamour, all of which became even more motivated, amplified, exacerbated by the excited arrival—though excitement really over naught—of even more young newcomers …

When the mentally ill began arriving in greater number into the city block it had followed their recent de-institutionalization from the colossal centralized psychiatric ‘sanctuary’ situated upon a high hillside with a view of the River; they were then instituted into group homes from whence they were then re-de-institutionalized into “semi-independent-living” housing located throughout the region including the said city block filled with apartment complexes …

Soon the young man noticed an increasing number in the odd facial expression sometimes accompanied by a somewhat conspicuous body motor coordination amongst the growing number of new residents passing him on neighbourhood sidewalks, those lining the streets forming the block saturated with mental-health-ministry-dependent case-file folks living “semi independently” …

Many of those latter new tenants could recall being treated callously (or at best apathetically) over their many years there where the River was highly viewed, thus they were satisfied at being even-so-suddenly solitarily sustained independently within each’s own new home at the old apartment complexes—all where the young man resided while too often being susceptible and victim to neighbours’ reverberating rambunctiousness …

Matters sometimes became exceptionally odd, inexplicably abnormal, particularly when on two occasions he’d passed by the same tall and lanky psychotic man reading a book as he walked along the sidewalk, the first time with a lit cigarette in his other hand and the second time also while it rained; he held the book up to his face at eye level (perhaps to keep the rain drops from falling directly onto the pages) without even once breaking away from his read or tripping over his own feet—yet on both occasions he seemingly didn’t allow his walk-and-read to be hindered by anything at all …

There, in frustration the young man within his own unit found he couldn’t attentively read or write—not essays nor letters, stories nor poems, therefore having eliminated from his life a crucial element to the tolerability of his troubled psyche; for, his precious yet debilitated concentration was greatly impaired by the badly bothersome tenants who could even quickly turn into well-inebriated inebriants whose sole goal in contemporary life was receiving their biweekly paycheques signed and delivered toward further inebriation …

There indeed for the young man peace of mind had formed all around it entrenched mental obstructs, since within (and even without) that apartment complex came increasing sources of disturbance but especially accursed distraction as though being conspired against by the collective live-it-up mentality foundation seemingly cemented all around that entire city block …

Yet over the next many score months that city block flock would progressively regress for him in co-habitability with rambunctious neighbours, from that of hearing his own thoughts to that of residing within an unfortunate local locale for people dis-functioning: a city block for those loudly intoxicated while interlaced with poor souls haplessly mentally dislocated amongst a herded concentration of psyches seemingly neither here nor there with their lives, with their progressive resolutions and goals, a semblance of normalcy, amidst the town’s mental block …

Hopefully with finality he had capitulated to the depressing reality of the paper walls, doors, etcetera, obstructing solely visual invasions from hallway to unit, unit to unit, and outdoors to indoors along with the virtual free-reign of various inconsiderate wanton disturbances it entails and about which he could do naught …

Those conditions of his residency there, all combined with his mentally over-burdensome dysfunctional thought processes would leave with him a mental block hindering his reading, writing, worrying, even his reliably habitual worrying …

At the end of the figurative day the young man had to accept that his greatly flawed neighbourhood block was one of likely many around town infested with an absence of pristine serenity for weary psyches such as his, overly attuned to the brainwave-jamming hard-static frequencies overly represented in the area.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

It Was In All Due Fairness [FANTASY]

I’ve long felt that, as much as many people may try, humans are not capable of true empathy. Rather, the best we can do to cerebrally experience the suffering of others is by relating somewhat to them via our own similar experiences/pain. Oh, how much the world would be better if only we all literally/fully shared the pains — and joys, for that matter — of everyone else without exception. … The fictional account below is my reflection on that.

___________

LISTENING to her teenaged daughter’s recorded screams, the distraught mother could not contain her grief. With heaving sobs, she stood to leave the courtroom, only to have her weakened knees buckle and collapse onto the courtroom floor. Gasps came from many spectators (some others she’d suspected to be but voyeurs), as the bailiff, district attorney, and even defense council, rushing to assist the bereaved woman.

Slowly, gently facilitating the trembling frail woman to her feet, the three courtroom officials somehow misperceived stability in her pale expression and gradually pulled away their hands. But she was so shaken by the prosecution’s key evidence — that of the accused’s own trophy audio-video of her only child’s last tortured hours alive — she fell hard, flat unconscious.

The night she was kidnapped, the desperate mother had locked her daughter out of the house in an attempt to correct the otherwise average girl’s increasing tendency to breach curfew. It was the first (and tragically final) time the mother had, still with much reluctance, attempted such a tough-love measure. Only it had gone the most horribly wrong.

By all accounts, the mother had been a fine parent, as was the girl’s father; although he, until then healthy, had died suddenly of a massive coronary less than a month after his “little princess” had been prolongedly tortured, then murdered in the worst way. The girl’s assailant had caused her all the real hell any parent wishes against their child ever having to nightmare about, let alone actually instinctively enduring for the sake of surviving the atrocity, only to be snuffed out at day’s end anyway.

And that appeared to have been the last straw. …

Suddenly everyone on Earth was aware of an unprecedentedly profound Great Change, and one that would become a far better existence than just moments before. The planet-wide awakening was a massive shift that would finally find favor for the most materially, physically, mentally and spiritually poor people of all.

For starters, every fortunate person was forced, as though by true magic, to empathically share in the anguish suffered by the greatest life-sentence affliction that Fate can cruelly, yet with cold apathy, reserve for a parent — a child lost to a torturous death. Now all bore a tiny portion — thus one sometimes imperceivable — of that enormous emotional turmoil otherwise suffered solely by those individuals who’d received the lottery-jackpot-odds meanest of parental luck possible.

In rehabilitative return, those most unfortunate parents who’d suffered such unjust extreme loss, inexplicably felt very great relief from their overwhelming affliction. Their trembling hands slowly left their tear-streaked faces, for their heavy hearts no longer suffered the agony alone.

With the supernatural change, however involuntary, when all shared in such a terrible personal toll, it became a literal — rather than just the common figurative — sharing of grief. It was analogous to a fiscally imprudent national government that had invested a large sum of treasury funds into an eventually losing deal; but with the shortfall shouldered by the large collective citizenry, the burden on the individual taxpayer was so much greatly lessened, if not unnoticeable.

Rather than being specific thought invasively transmitted and received, it was loosely comparable to an expecting husband’s sympathy pains suffered for his greatly laboring pregnant wife. Even academics agreed it was akin to everyone having been spontaneously cerebrally re-hardwired to literally share in others’ dreadful suffering, like so many undisturbed antennas suddenly receiving the immensely distressed signals from a few isolated agonized antennas.

Most assumed the change was implemented by a kindly sentient omnipotent source. This was defined by monotheists as God, and by polytheists as multiple powerful spirits; while others believed greatly advanced caring alien-race monitors were responsible. Many secular humanists theorized it was simply the good within humankind itself psychically coming to long-overdue overpowering conscience terms with the disproportionate injustices suffered by some but not by most others.

Of course the change was also well received by many other worldwide examples of disproportionate suffering, notably that of desperately poor citizens of developing nations wanting for the most basic of life’s necessities.

Indeed, great empathic relief was felt long before the arrival of overflowing shipments of water purification devices, as well as the exponentially larger quantities of food and medicine than ever before — all gratefully given by the prosperous nations because the planet’s privileged people were abruptly enduring what had consumed the world’s most needy for far too long. And in return, the fortunate givers felt physically and mentally so much better.

Although initially the otherwise fortunate felt indignant by the change, that they’d done nothing personally wrong to justify the unfavorable empathy they’d have to endure, soon it no longer felt like an imposition but rather a universal effect in which all were naturally wanting to treat all affliction, just as though it was in fact one’s very own turmoil.

And contrary to the usual human-history pendulum swing of ideological and political mood, the Great Change was a permanently solidified authentic sense of others’ upheaval, therefore no chance would remain of all reverting to the unjust existential norm of yore.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]

All Children Deserve Far Better Than What This World Frequently Throws At Them [ESSAY]

“The way a society functions is a reflection of the childrearing practices of that society. Today we reap what we have sown. Despite the well-documented critical nature of early life experiences, we dedicate few resources to this time of life. We do not educate our children about child development, parenting, or the impact of neglect and trauma on children.”

—Dr. Bruce D. Perry, Ph.D. & Dr. John Marcellus

“This is the most important job we have to do as humans and as citizens … If we offer classes in auto mechanics and civics, why not parenting? A lot of what happens to children that’s bad derives from ignorance … Parents go by folklore, or by what they’ve heard, or by their instincts, all of which can be very wrong.”

—Dr. Alvin F. Poussaint, Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School

_____________________________________

IN protest to newly mandated elementary school curriculum teaching something undoubtedly controversial, a picket sign read, “We don’t co-parent with the government”. Yet, maybe a lot of incompetent yet procreative parents nowadays should.

The author of Childhood Disrupted says: “[Even] well-meaning and loving parents can unintentionally do harm to a child if they are not well informed about human development” (pg.24).

Regarding early-life trauma, people tend to know (perhaps commonsensically) that they should not loudly quarrel when, for instance, a baby is in the next room; however, do they know about the intricacies of why not? Since it cannot fight or flight, a baby stuck in a crib on its back hearing parental discord in the next room can only “move into a third neurological state, known as a ‘freeze’ state … This freeze state is a trauma state” (pg.123). This causes its brain to improperly develop. It’s like a form of non-physical-impact brain damage.

Also, it’s the unpredictability of a stressor, and not the intensity, that does the most harm? When the stressor “is completely predictable, even if it is more traumatic — such as giving a [laboratory] rat a regularly scheduled foot shock accompanied by a sharp, loud sound — the stress does not create these exact same [negative] brain changes” (pg.42).

Furthermore, how many of us were aware that, since young children completely rely on their parents for protection and sustenance, they will understandably stress over having their parents angry at them for prolonged periods of time? It makes me question the wisdom of punishing children by sending them to their room without dinner. …

Meantime, way too many people will still procreate, some prolifically even, regardless of their questionable ability to raise their children in a psychologically functional/healthy manner. Thus I wonder how much immense long-term suffering might have been prevented had the parent(s) of a future tyrant received, as high school students, some crucial child development science education by way of mandatory curriculum? After all, dysfunctional and/or abusive parents, for example, may not have had the chance to be anything else due to their lack of such education and their own dysfunctional/abusive rearing as children.

Owing to the Only If It’s In My Own Back Yard mindset, however, the prevailing collective attitude (implicit or subconscious) basically follows: ‘Why should I care — my kids are alright?’ or ‘What is in it for me, the taxpayer, if I support social programs for other people’s troubled families?’ While some people will justify it as a normal thus moral human evolutionary function, the self-serving OIIIMOBY can debilitate social progress, even when social progress is most needed. And it seems this distinct form of societal penny wisdom but pound foolishness is a very unfortunate human characteristic that’s likely with us to stay.

Perhaps not surprising, I’m of the school of thought that the health of all children needs to be of real importance to everyone — and not just concern over what other parents’ children might or will cost us as future criminals or costly cases of government care, etcetera — regardless of how well our own developing children are doing. Simply mindlessly ‘minding our own business’ often proves humanly devastating.  

——— 

MEANWHILE, along with the K-12 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity curriculum already taught (at least in Canadian public schools), cerebral diversity curriculum could also be implemented. Through this the incidence of vicious bullying against, for example, students with an autism spectrum disorder might be reduced.

When all teachers are fully educated on ASD, there could be an inclusion in standard high school curriculum of a child development course, albeit not overly complicated, which in part would teach about the often-debilitating condition.

It would explain to students how, among other aspects of the condition, ASD people, including higher functioning autistics, are often deemed willfully ‘difficult’ and socially incongruent, when such behavior is really not a choice for them. Furthermore, when around their neurotypical peers, people with ASD typically feel compelled to “camouflage” or “mask”, terms used to describe their attempts at appearing to naturally fit in when around their neurotypical peers, an effort known to cause their already high anxiety and/or depression levels to worsen. And, of course, this exacerbation is reflected in the disproportionately high rate of suicide among ASD people.

If nothing else, such child-development science curriculum would offer students an idea/clue as to whether they’re emotionally/mentally compatible with the immense responsibility and strains of parenthood, especially with such special-needs children.

There could also be childrearing/parenting instruction in regards to children born with ASD. Low-functioning autism is already readily recognized and treated, but higher-functioning ASD cases are basically left to fend for themselves. …

Perhaps in great crises, every parent would go all out in an attempt to make their child feel secure; however, in stable times those parents may not notice their more subtle dysfunctional rearing. For instance, how many people are aware that even a parent’s prolonged silent but subtly noticeable anger towards his/her young child can, if frequently practiced, leave the growing child with a strong sense of vulnerability; for, the perceptive child relies on the parent(s) for survival and is therefore susceptible to hunger, etcetera, if the angry parent’s protection/provisions are withdrawn.

Meanwhile, general society perceives and treats human reproductive “rights” as though we’ll somehow, in blind anticipation, be innately inclined to sufficiently understand and appropriately nurture our children’s naturally developing minds and needs.

As a moral rule, a physically and mentally sound future should be every child’s fundamental right — along with air, water, food and shelter — especially considering the very troubled world into which they never asked to enter.

_____________________________________

“I remember leaving the hospital thinking, ‘Wait, are they going to let me just walk off with him? I don’t know beans about babies! I don’t have a license to do this. We’re just amateurs’.”

—Anne Tyler, Breathing Lessons


“It’s only after children have been discovered to be severely battered that their parents are forced to take a childrearing course as a condition of regaining custody. That’s much like requiring no license or driver’s ed[ucation] to drive a car, then waiting until drivers injure or kill someone before demanding that they learn how to drive.”

—Myriam Miedzian, Ph.D.

[Frank G Sterle Jr]